1978
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/41/10/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic properties of the actinide elements and their metallic compounds

Abstract: A review is given of the magnetic properties of metallic actinides, and of the relationship between their properties and their electronic structures. It is shown that the 5f electrons of light actinides often form into bands, rather than exist as localised electrons as is usually the case for the 4f electrons of metallic rare earths. The 5f bands form due to 5f-5f wavefunction overlap or to hybridisation with s, p or d electrons. As a result of the band formation, a wide variety of magnetic phenomena may occur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For non-interacting electrons, the electronic specific heat coefficient γ is proportional to the total density of states N(E F ) at the Fermi level and is given by But for UN and PuN, we observe a large discrepancy between our estimated values and experimental data. To match theoretical electronic specific heat coefficient γ to experimental values, it should be corrected as γ(corrected) = γ (band)*(1 + λ) where the parameter λ takes into account, the electron-phonon interactions and many body effects, and γ(band) is our computed value [37]. We intend to pursue such studies in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-interacting electrons, the electronic specific heat coefficient γ is proportional to the total density of states N(E F ) at the Fermi level and is given by But for UN and PuN, we observe a large discrepancy between our estimated values and experimental data. To match theoretical electronic specific heat coefficient γ to experimental values, it should be corrected as γ(corrected) = γ (band)*(1 + λ) where the parameter λ takes into account, the electron-phonon interactions and many body effects, and γ(band) is our computed value [37]. We intend to pursue such studies in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, spin fluctuations have been proposed as the reason for the anomalous low-temperature resistivity behavior of Pu that shows no magnetism in the metal (Nellis et al, 1970;Arko et al, 1972). Spin fluctuations can be thought of as spin alignments that have lifetimes less than ~10 -14 seconds and are therefore too short to see via specific heat, susceptibility, or nuclear magnetic resonance (Brodsky 1978).…”
Section: B Actinide Series Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the localized rare-earth metals, the atoms are usually in a unique ground state; however, this is not the case for the light actinides where delocalization and d-f mixing causes mixed-valence to occur. Indeed, as far back as the late 1970's this was understood, as evidenced by the following quote by Brodsky (1978): "In the case of the actinides (not unlike nickel) the ground state is nearly always a mixture of configurations, and it is only on rare occasions that the nearly equal energies of the 5f, 6d and 7s (also 7p) become separated and permit a single configuration to be the ground state." From Am on, the actinides exhibit a unique ground state due to localization of the 5f states.…”
Section: Dynamical Mean-field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual electronic structure of these compounds is thus more complex than can be reproduced by either the localized or itinerant f limit of the SIC-LSD single Slater determinant wavefunction. If the true ground-state is fluctuating between a given set of configurations, as is the case for PuC (where the f 3 and f 4 configurations are close to being energetically equivalent), some intermediate degree of localization may be expected. The fact that f 3 gives the global energy minimum, and that localizing an additional f-electron is only slightly less favorable, might also indicate an intermediate scenario with three localized f-electrons and a strongly renormalized itinerant f-peak.…”
Section: Carbides and Nitridesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic and magnetic properties of U compounds for example are very different from those of the corresponding Bk compounds [3]. Even for a given actinide element, its various alloys and compounds can display a wide spectrum of behavior, from localized to itinerant, due to the large effect that small changes in external or chemical pressure have on the f-electron contribution to the chemical bonding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%