2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance–based Motion Correction for Quantitative PET in Simultaneous PET-MR Imaging

Abstract: Motion degrades image quality and quantitation of PET images, and is an obstacle to quantitative PET imaging. Simultaneous PET-MR offers a tool that can be used for correcting the motion in PET images by using anatomic information from MR imaging acquired concurrently. Motion correction can be performed by transforming a set of reconstructed PET images into the same frame or by incorporating the transformation into the system model and reconstructing the motion-corrected image. Several phantom and patient stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the radiological review regarding noise level, non‐MoCo PET images were rated to have equal or less noise than the MoCo 2000 and MoCo P2P200 PET images. This result is consistent with previous findings that the MCIR method amplifies noise compared to the non‐MoCo 27–31 . However, no significant difference was found between the three PET reconstructions (non‐MoCo, MoCo 2000, and MoCo P2P200 ) in Dunn's post hoc pairwise comparison, perhaps due to the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the radiological review regarding noise level, non‐MoCo PET images were rated to have equal or less noise than the MoCo 2000 and MoCo P2P200 PET images. This result is consistent with previous findings that the MCIR method amplifies noise compared to the non‐MoCo 27–31 . However, no significant difference was found between the three PET reconstructions (non‐MoCo, MoCo 2000, and MoCo P2P200 ) in Dunn's post hoc pairwise comparison, perhaps due to the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In PET/MR hybrid scanners, the use of MRI navigators or tagging pulse sequences, interleaved with normal acquisition, can provide the rigid or non-rigid motion fields needed for motion correction of the PET data [117]. These and other MR-based methods are discussed in section 6 of this roadmap article.…”
Section: Line-of-response Rebinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 For larger lesions, respiratory motion may likewise introduce bias in radiomic features that quantify lesion shape and texture. [9][10][11] Additionally, the mismatch between PET and computed tomography (CT) images due to motion may lead to errors in attenuation correction and scatter estimation. 12,13 Hence, there is an extensive ongoing effort to understand and evaluate the effect of respiratory motion in routine clinical PET imaging, particularly with respect to thoracic lesion detectability and quantification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%