2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0526-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary pathology

Abstract: MRCP and EUS do not show significant statistical differences in diagnostic accuracy. MRCP is an accurate, noninvasive modality in the study of extrahepatic biliary pathology. EUS is especially reliable in patients with extrahepatic biliary obstruction caused by endoluminal sludge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] MR cholangiopancreatography is noninvasive and capable of providing an anatomic map of the biliary tree and pancreatic duct without the use of ionizing radiation or contrast medium. 2 MR cholangiopancreatography is based on the principle that slow moving fluids are hyperintense on heavily T2weighted images, so bile and pancreatic fluids in the pancreaticobiliary system will be hyperintense resulting in increased duct to background contrast, particularly when postprocessed as maximum intensity projections (MIP). 3,4 MR cholangiopancreatography has been compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which is the gold standard for evaluating pancreaticobiliary disorders in people.…”
Section: S Ince the Introduction Of Magnetic Resonance (Mr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] MR cholangiopancreatography is noninvasive and capable of providing an anatomic map of the biliary tree and pancreatic duct without the use of ionizing radiation or contrast medium. 2 MR cholangiopancreatography is based on the principle that slow moving fluids are hyperintense on heavily T2weighted images, so bile and pancreatic fluids in the pancreaticobiliary system will be hyperintense resulting in increased duct to background contrast, particularly when postprocessed as maximum intensity projections (MIP). 3,4 MR cholangiopancreatography has been compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which is the gold standard for evaluating pancreaticobiliary disorders in people.…”
Section: S Ince the Introduction Of Magnetic Resonance (Mr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR cholangiopancreatography was as accurate as endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, but without the associated risks, such as acute pancreatitis, cholangitis, perforation, and hemorrhage. [1][2][3]5,9,13 The advantages to MR cholangiopancreatography include its noninvasive nature, decreased operator dependence, compared with endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, better demonstration of ducts proximal to an obstruction/stenosis, and, when combined with conventional T1 and T2 imaging, anatomic imaging of extraductal disease within the liver and pancreas. 4,14 Cholangitis/cholangiohepatitis is second only to hepatic lipidosis as the most common liver disease in cats and is either lymphocytic or neutrophilic.…”
Section: S Ince the Introduction Of Magnetic Resonance (Mr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leakage was spontaneously closed after ERCP without any additional intervention in nine patients, all with the low-output leakage. The period for the spontaneous closure after ERCP was average seven (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) days. Spontaneous closure was achieved in 14 patients who underwent sphincterotomy during ERCP and in 56 patients who underwent plastic stent placement additionally to sphincterotomy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, EUS is able to guide fine-needle aspiration (FNA) (Figure 5) [37]. The fluid content could be analysed for the presence of oncological marker.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Imaging Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is an invasive [24], heavily operator-dependent modality that requires patient sedation [37]. Recent “European expert consensus statement on cystic tumours of the pancreas” remarked that EUS is “an invasive diagnostic procedure , ” which needs to be performed after cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRI), in a multimodality imaging assessment of cystic pancreatic neoplasms [24].…”
Section: Cross-sectional Imaging Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%