2011
DOI: 10.3791/2356-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Myocardial feature tracking was performed based on standard CMR image data (Image-Arena VA Version 3.0 and 2D Cardiac Performance Analysis MR Version 1.1.0; TomTec Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany), which has been recently introduced [11,12]. The software does not require specific CMR acquisition such as tagged imaging or HARP analysis.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Myocardial feature tracking was performed based on standard CMR image data (Image-Arena VA Version 3.0 and 2D Cardiac Performance Analysis MR Version 1.1.0; TomTec Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany), which has been recently introduced [11,12]. The software does not require specific CMR acquisition such as tagged imaging or HARP analysis.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring myocardial strain by magnetic resonance imaging has required tagged imaging or harmonic phase (HARP) analysis, but the need for additional imaging sequences and the inherent complexity has limited the uptake of these techniques. Recently CMR based feature tracking analysis has become available, providing multi-planar strain data without the need for tagged images [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FT requires that in-plane spatial resolution is sufficient for the displacements of interest to be measured within the ability of the software to measure subpixel displacement. 17 Low temporal resolution can lead to transient spikes in motion being missed, potentially obscuring clinically significant motion. 2 It also causes interframe displacements to be large thus impairing FT, and image decorrelation (the reduction of the similarity of image features from frame to frame) that further impairs FT. 2 Conversely, high temporal resolution may not benefit, and may even impair, FT if not accompanied by increased in-plane spatial resolution, as frame-to-frame displacement is reduced relative to pixel size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 It also causes interframe displacements to be large thus impairing FT, and image decorrelation (the reduction of the similarity of image features from frame to frame) that further impairs FT. 2 Conversely, high temporal resolution may not benefit, and may even impair, FT if not accompanied by increased in-plane spatial resolution, as frame-to-frame displacement is reduced relative to pixel size. 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software developments now permit measurement of cardiac MRI‐derived LV strain from routinely acquired balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) cine images. This has the potential to shorten scan times and streamline analyses compared to previously used methods, such as myocardial tissue tagging and phase velocity mapping 9 . Strain derived from bSSFP methods has good agreement with speckle tracking echocardiography, 10,11 but agreement with cardiac MRI tagging methods has varied between studies, with radial strain showing the poorest agreement 12–16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%