2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07988-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance elastography biomarkers for detection of histologic alterations in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the absence of fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Itoh et al 31 measured 2D in‐plane stiffness values of 2.47 ± 0.11 kPa in volunteers at 60 Hz, with only one encoding direction, which was slightly higher than our reported 3D stiffness value of 2.19 ± 0.28 kPa. Previous studies have reported similar differences in the liver and brain using 2D and 3D MRE 32,33 . We speculate that through‐plane propagating waves may appear in 2D data as waves with longer wavelengths, thereby resulting in a slight overestimation of tissue stiffness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Itoh et al 31 measured 2D in‐plane stiffness values of 2.47 ± 0.11 kPa in volunteers at 60 Hz, with only one encoding direction, which was slightly higher than our reported 3D stiffness value of 2.19 ± 0.28 kPa. Previous studies have reported similar differences in the liver and brain using 2D and 3D MRE 32,33 . We speculate that through‐plane propagating waves may appear in 2D data as waves with longer wavelengths, thereby resulting in a slight overestimation of tissue stiffness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Previous studies have reported similar differences in the liver and brain using 2D and 3D MRE. 32,33 We speculate that throughplane propagating waves may appear in 2D data as waves with longer wavelengths, thereby resulting in a slight overestimation of tissue stiffness. The overall mean shear stiffness of PDAC in our study was 3.50 AE 0.34 kPa at 40 Hz, which was similar to the results obtained in 43 patients with PDAC reported by Shi et al (3.30 kPa).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, PET scans are expensive, they result in exposure of the patient to ionizing radiation and they address only specific metabolic pathways that are not necessarily fully suited for assessment of the liver’s metabolic capacity. Ultrasound-based elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) have become successful in addressing structural changes such as like degree of fibrosis and steatosis, and they therefore have the potential to replace biopsy-based histological evaluation of structural alteration ( Singh et al, 2015 ; Castera et al, 2019 ; Hudert et al, 2021 ; Qu et al, 2021 ; Selvaraj et al, 2021 ). Liver fibrosis increases liver stiffness through accumulation and cross-linking of matrix proteins ( Huwart et al, 2008 ; Singh et al, 2015 ; Reiter et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver fibrosis increases liver stiffness through accumulation and cross-linking of matrix proteins ( Huwart et al, 2008 ; Singh et al, 2015 ; Reiter et al, 2020 ). However, beyond fibrosis, the liver’s biomechanical properties are also affected by non-fibrotic alterations such as prandial states ( Yin et al, 2011 ; Jajamovich et al, 2014 ; Petzold et al, 2019 ; Obrzut et al, 2021 ), hydration ( Ipek-Ugay et al, 2016 ; Dittmann et al, 2017 ), blood perfusion ( Ipek-Ugay et al, 2016 ; Meyer et al, 2022a ), cell hypertrophy ( Garczyńska et al, 2020 ), fat accumulation ( Hudert et al, 2019 ) or inflammation ( Qu et al, 2021 ; Selvaraj et al, 2021 ), making elastography unspecifically sensitive to a variety of pathophysiological processes that occur in the course of NAFLD. Only little is known about the correlation between liver biomechanical parameters and liver metabolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%