Since the reemergence of the transsphenoidal approach as a primary means of accessing and resecting sellar region tumors in the 1960s by Hardy and Guiot, several key advances have improved the ability to safely treat patients with larger and increasingly complex tumors of the anterior and middle skull base. 28,43 In particular, the operating microscope, extended transsphenoidal approaches, advanced neuroimaging, intraoperative neuronavigation, and neuroendoscopy have collectively improved the ability to safely treat many of these lesions. The evolution of extended transsphenoidal approaches and endoscopic instrumentation has facilitated surgical access to lesions of the midline skull base via natural corridors, along a wide arc from the frontal sinus to the odontoid process. 9,31,34,53 Equally important are recent developments in effectively reconstructing the skull base after tumor resection, thereby reducing the incidence of CSF leakage and associated infection, which has traditionally been one of the major pitfalls associated with transsphenoidal and related skull base approaches.As the subspecialty of endoscopic skull base surgery continues to "push the edge of the envelope" in regard to the spectrum of lesions that can be effectively and safely treated, the key limitations to the types and extent of tumor pathology that can be optimally resected via these approaches must be continuously reassessed. In some instances, these limitations are inherent to an individual tumor's biology and pose a surgical challenge regardless of the operative approach that is undertaken. Nevertheless, patient selection remains of paramount importance Results. Thirteen cases exemplifying some of the existing limitations to achieving optimal surgical outcomes via transsphenoidal-based approaches are presented. The following 8 factors are separately discussed that repeatedly limited the extent of resection, increased the risk of the operation, and contributed to perioperative complications: significant suprasellar extension, lateral extension, retrosellar extension, brain invasion with edema, firm tumor consistency, involvement or vasospasm of the arteries of the circle of Willis, and encasement of the optic apparatus or invasion of the optic foramina.Conclusions. Although the ability to approach and resect complex tumors using endonasal skull base techniques has evolved dramatically in recent years, several inherent tumor characteristics mandate extensive preoperative consideration. In selected cases these characteristics may lend support to selecting an open craniotomy as the initial operation. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS10520)
Key words • transsphenoidal approach • endoscopic surgery • skull base surgery • pituitary adenoma • meningioma • craniopharyngioma • invasionAbbreviations used in this paper: ACA = anterior cerebral artery; DI = diabetes insipidus; EBRT = external-beam radiation therapy; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; GTR = gross-total resection; ICA = internal carotid artery; PBRT = proton-beam radiation therapy; P...