2021
DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Value-Added Review

Abstract: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a known cause of maternal mortality and may be misdiagnosed in up to 50% of pregnant female individuals (Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(1):10-17). Magnetic resonance imaging, with its superior soft tissue resolution, is a valuable alternative diagnostic modality to diagnose EP when transvaginal ultrasound results are inconclusive. Although an extrauterine gestational sac is the most specific finding, there are other key MRI findings that can aid in diagnosing EP. As availability of MRI access… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This diagnostic technology offers a high-definition evaluation of intra-abdominal and pelvic anatomy with increased soft tissue contrast and multiplanar imaging without the risk of ionizing radiation. The sensitivity of MRI ranges from 92% to 100% for the identification of ectopic pregnancy and is nearly 100% for detecting appendicitis [ 8 ]. Unfortunately, MRI still has limited availability in many locales, is costly, and requires considerable time to perform compared to ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diagnostic technology offers a high-definition evaluation of intra-abdominal and pelvic anatomy with increased soft tissue contrast and multiplanar imaging without the risk of ionizing radiation. The sensitivity of MRI ranges from 92% to 100% for the identification of ectopic pregnancy and is nearly 100% for detecting appendicitis [ 8 ]. Unfortunately, MRI still has limited availability in many locales, is costly, and requires considerable time to perform compared to ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%