2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of residual ductal carcinoma in situ following preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results identified that the proposed method demonstrated improved performance in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions compared with the traditional method. For TIC classification, although the sensitivity of the traditional method was high, its specificity was low, which is in agreement with a number of previous studies (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Low specificity in DCE-MRI diagnosis may lead to low accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results identified that the proposed method demonstrated improved performance in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions compared with the traditional method. For TIC classification, although the sensitivity of the traditional method was high, its specificity was low, which is in agreement with a number of previous studies (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Low specificity in DCE-MRI diagnosis may lead to low accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Detection of DCIS by MRI is likely to improve in future and can become a regular indication of post-NAC MRI, however, further studies are needed to assess MRI efficacy in assessing DCIS after NAC. [192021]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the case size was changed, both the optimal cutoff value and accuracy rate might be changed accordingly. Second, both the manual method and the semi-automatic method were performed only once, hence the inter- and intra-observer variabilities were not investigated [26], although we assumed that the semi-automatic method might offer greater reproducibility by virtue of its simplicity and quantification, especially when deployed across multiple sites in a large-scale clinical trial [33,48]. Third, in this study, we only analyzed the TICs from breast DCE-MRI, whereas the morphologic features of the lesions were not utilized for breast diagnosis, which could have further improved the diagnostic accuracy of breast DCE-MRI [17,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%