2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00883.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement in temporomandibular joints without a clinical diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalences of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings of internal derangement (ID) in temporomandibular joints (TMJs) without a specific clinical diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), and to investigate whether in this TMJ group the variable of pain may be linked to MR imaging findings of ID. The study comprised 109 patients, who were assigned a clinical uni- or bilateral TMJ-related diagnosis of 'absence of TMD'. Bilateral sagittal and coronal MR images w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
1
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
26
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data showed that pain is not a reliable predictor of internal derangement, which is in agreement with the findings of other studies. 4,6,11 Regarding the type of disc displacement observed in the present study, the proportion of DDwoR was higher than that of DDwR (23% vs 12.8%) which is in agreement with the findings of Emshoff et al 12,16 but in disagreement with the findings of another study where 82.5% of cases had disc displacement, of which 59.5% demonstrated reduction with opening and 40.5% did not reduce. Anterior disc displacement is common (44%) and sideways displacement is rare (4%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our data showed that pain is not a reliable predictor of internal derangement, which is in agreement with the findings of other studies. 4,6,11 Regarding the type of disc displacement observed in the present study, the proportion of DDwoR was higher than that of DDwR (23% vs 12.8%) which is in agreement with the findings of Emshoff et al 12,16 but in disagreement with the findings of another study where 82.5% of cases had disc displacement, of which 59.5% demonstrated reduction with opening and 40.5% did not reduce. Anterior disc displacement is common (44%) and sideways displacement is rare (4%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…3,5,9,11,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19] Nevertheless, the absence of TMD signs has been associated with high rates of internal derangement, which confirms that a clinical diagnosis of internal derangement is not a reliable tool to predict an imaging diagnosis of internal derangement. 6 From the 148 TMJs studied, 94 (63.5%) presented N, 34 (23%) presented DDwoR, 19 (12.8%) presented DDwR and 1 (0.7%) presented PD (Table 1). Based on these data, only 36.48% of the study sample was classified as presenting internal derangement, which is in disagreement with the findings of Emshoff et al 16 who reported a strong correlation between pain and internal derangement (64.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, past studies applying a magnetic resonance imaging method have found anterior disc displacement in 20 % of clinically asymptomatic individuals [29,35]. As a clinical assessment method was used to detect TMJ conditions in this study, the potential mixture of asymptomatic anterior disc displacement and normal subjects in the control group could result in a similar distribution of the ANKH genotypes between the cases and the controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Before inclusion, informed consent was sought from all participants. Each was checked for the history of TMD and was assessed with standard clinical procedures including evaluation of mandibular range of motion, joint pain and joint sounds [29]. As TMJ clicking accompanying with other joint symptoms indicated different types of TMD and/or medical conditions [6][7][8], participants appearing with any joint symptoms but clicking were excluded from this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%