2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
124
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
124
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Level-II evidence is available showing that breast MRI visualizes disease extent more accurately than conventional breast imaging [8][9][10][11]. This evidence has created much confidence in favor of MRI in patients as well as in practitioners, making it difficult to implement prospective comparative level-I studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Level-II evidence is available showing that breast MRI visualizes disease extent more accurately than conventional breast imaging [8][9][10][11]. This evidence has created much confidence in favor of MRI in patients as well as in practitioners, making it difficult to implement prospective comparative level-I studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional imaging by mammography and ultrasonography fails to accurately assess tumor extent in approximately one-third of patients eligible for BCT [7]. Several studies reported a higher sensitivity of contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE MRI) to detect invasive breast cancer and to visualize disease extent compared to the standard workup using conventional imaging [8][9][10][11]. These observations have led to changes in the surgical management of patients [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast MRIs are reported to diagnose breast cancer more precisely and predict size more accurately as it judges the lesion by combining the morphological standard and the result of the dynamic contrast enhancing making it different from mammography or breast ultrasonography [19,20]. In addition, MRCP shows excellent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of the pancreaticobiliary duct and in the diagnostic of pancreaticobiliary duct diseases, it is carried out prior to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI also detected all additional tumour foci found at subsequent histopathology compared with detection rates of 31% and 38% by mammography and USS, respectively. Hata et al 19 also examined the ability of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI to detect intraductal spread of tumour in comparison with USS and mammography. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of detection for intraductal spread by DCE-MRI were 66.7%, 64.2% and 65.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of repeat MRI findings are displayed in Appendix 15 (Clinical significance of < 5-mm MRI-only-detected lesions: repeat MRI findings) for those patients who underwent a repeat scan. Median time from randomisation to repeat MR scan was 15 months (range [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Median time from starting adjuvant radiotherapy to repeat scan was 13 months (range 4-17) for the 12 patients who received radiotherapy.…”
Section: Mri-only-detected Lesions < 5 MMmentioning
confidence: 99%