2021
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Abstract: Technological advances have enabled well tolerated and effective radiation treatment for small liver metastases. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) refers to ablative dose delivery (>100 Gy BED) in five fractions or fewer. For larger tumors, the safe delivery of SABR can be challenging due to a more limited volume of healthy normal liver parenchyma and the proximity of the tumor to radiosensitive organs such as the stomach, duodenum, and large intestine. In addition to stereotactic treatment del… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique allows for better visualization of soft tissue, real-time tumor tracking, motion management (during the breathing cycle) via deep inspiration breath holding techniques (to allow for smaller target volumes), and adaptive planning (to improve target dosing while limiting dose to radiosensitive organs [that move with the respiratory cycle and change their juxtaposition daily] in line with recommended dose constraint guidelines) (74,80). Although the normal organ constraints come from retrospective series, CT based planning (that assumes mobile structures remain in the same position throughout treatment), and animal studies, some have posited that radiation toxicity risks may be overestimated, the dose constraints too conservative, and the tumor unnecessarily underdosed (to meet the dose constraints) in patients treated with MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy (81). Thus, through a combination of raising the tolerance for normal organs at risk and reducing the margins delivered through MRI guidance, the overall dose to the tumor could be substantially increased or improved (82).…”
Section: Liver Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique allows for better visualization of soft tissue, real-time tumor tracking, motion management (during the breathing cycle) via deep inspiration breath holding techniques (to allow for smaller target volumes), and adaptive planning (to improve target dosing while limiting dose to radiosensitive organs [that move with the respiratory cycle and change their juxtaposition daily] in line with recommended dose constraint guidelines) (74,80). Although the normal organ constraints come from retrospective series, CT based planning (that assumes mobile structures remain in the same position throughout treatment), and animal studies, some have posited that radiation toxicity risks may be overestimated, the dose constraints too conservative, and the tumor unnecessarily underdosed (to meet the dose constraints) in patients treated with MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy (81). Thus, through a combination of raising the tolerance for normal organs at risk and reducing the margins delivered through MRI guidance, the overall dose to the tumor could be substantially increased or improved (82).…”
Section: Liver Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for better monitoring for in-treatment changes in position of the lesion to treat. Additionally, it allows for a better delimitation of tumors in the liver [ 133 ]. For liver metastases, fiducial placement is usually used to improve correct treatment delivery.…”
Section: Local Ablative Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For liver metastases, fiducial placement is usually used to improve correct treatment delivery. In MR-guided SBRT, no fiducials are needed, avoiding an unnecessary invasive procedure [ 133 ]. Apart from the treated lesion, a margin of 5 mm of normal tissue is usually added.…”
Section: Local Ablative Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 25–50% of patients will suffer from metastatic CRC (mCRC) over time [ 6 ]. Compared to localized CRC, the 5-year survival rate of mCRC is low at 14–20% [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%