1990
DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(90)90117-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease of newborns: preliminary results in 23 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63%) without affecting spatial resolution (1.2 mm 2 isotropic pixels). This, together with the already short repetition times (spontaneously high heart rates of newborns) and easily achieved proper sedation in neonates [11] greatly improves the diagnostic capabilities of MRI, indeed more scans are available in less total imaging time, facilitating tolerance in low-aged pediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…63%) without affecting spatial resolution (1.2 mm 2 isotropic pixels). This, together with the already short repetition times (spontaneously high heart rates of newborns) and easily achieved proper sedation in neonates [11] greatly improves the diagnostic capabilities of MRI, indeed more scans are available in less total imaging time, facilitating tolerance in low-aged pediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We have encountered rio major difficulties in imaging the newborn. This procedure is capable of furnishing high resolution multiplanar images of the heart and is well tolerated even by premature newborns [11]. Other authors have suggested that MR imaging may be helpful in the evaluation of palliative systemic-pulmonary shunts in older children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past decade, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has proved to be a capable non-invasive complement [1][2][3][4][5]. Even newborns are well suited for cardiac MR studies [6,7]. Each diagnostic method has its drawbacks, however, and in some cases the exact anatomy will be difficult to evaluate whatever method is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%