2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging in fetal anomalies: What does it add to 3D and 4D US?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the existing literature [11,23,24] and is especially true for ventriculomegaly, as this might be a mere symptom of a complex underlying brain anomaly. Fetal MRI could differentiate between acquired, obstructive, isolated or non-syndromic and syndromic/malformative ventriculomegaly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is consistent with the existing literature [11,23,24] and is especially true for ventriculomegaly, as this might be a mere symptom of a complex underlying brain anomaly. Fetal MRI could differentiate between acquired, obstructive, isolated or non-syndromic and syndromic/malformative ventriculomegaly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In spite of the apparent advantages of 3D obstetrical imaging, non-favourable scanning conditions, such as oligohydramnios, severe 21 Although ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of the fetus, because of proven utility, relatively low cost and widespread availability, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has grown in popularity over the past two decades as a complementary tool for antenatal assessment of fetal abnormalities 70,71 . MRI has been useful in confirming abnormalities seen on ultrasound scan or determining the underlying cause of nonspecific sonographic anomalies and may add incremental information that might have influence on prognosis or management at birth [72][73][74] . Faster scanning techniques allow studies to be performed without sedation in the second and third trimester with minimal motion artefacts 75 .…”
Section: Other Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common type of fetal cystic kidney disease is MCDK (Potter type II), which is usually unilateral with normal amniotic fluid and good prognosis, but when bilateral MCKD is diagnosed, it is usually accompanied by oligohydramnios and the prognosis is very poor, because of pulmonary hypoplasia (21). When the MRI findings were compared with postnatal ultrasound finding, it provided the same diagnosis in 46 cases, while it gave a different diagnosis (false positive) in 6 cases, and when (23). The prenatal ultrasound was 100% sensitive, 99.9% specific with 85% PPV and accuracy in the diagnosis of suspected renal anomalies; it gave similar diagnosis to postnatal ultrasound in 43 cases, while it gave a different diagnosis (false positive) in 9 cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%