Magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect patellofemoral focal cartilage injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect and grade the severity of patellofemoral (PF) cartilage injuries. Methods A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases (up to July 1st 2022) to search for studies that reported the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect and grade PF cartilage injuries as compared to diagnostic arthroscopy. Risk of bias was judged using the QUADAS-2 tool. Quantitative syntheses were performed to calculate the diagnostic accuracy metric-sensitivity, speciicity, positive likelihood (LR+) and negative likelihood (LR−) ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)-and presented as median with 25% and 75% percentiles. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also calculated. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated for all PF cartilage injuries and then sub-grouped by patellar and trochlear lesions. Diagnostic accuracy was also calculated according to the grading of cartilage injuries. Results Forty-ive studies were included for qualitative analyses and forty studies were included for quantitative synthesis. A total of 3534 participants with a weighted mean age of 38.1 years were included. Diagnostic accuracy was generally high: sensitivity (0.8, 0.6-1.0), speciicity (0.9, 0.8-1.0), LR+ (6.4,3), LR− (0.3, 0.2-0.4) and DOR (21.3,. The area under the curve (AUC) of the SROC was 0.9. The diagnostic accuracy was slightly higher for patellar (sensitivity 0.8, speciicity 0.8, LR+ 5.3, LR− 0.2, DOR 28.8) than for trochlear lesions (sensitivity 0.7, speciicity 0.9, LR+ 5.5, LR− 0.4, DOR 14.3). The sensitivity was generally higher when grading advanced (vs. early or intermediate) cartilage injuries of the patella. ConclusionThe MRI is able to diagnose PF cartilage injuries with reasonably high diagnostic accuracy (as compared to arthroscopy). Clinicians can rely on MRI to reliably diagnose PF cartilage injuries (with some limitations) which will play an important role in deciding for surgical or non-operative treatment. Level of evidence Level III.

Construction of multi-scale feature fusion segmentation model of MRI knee images based on dual attention mechanism weighted aggregation

“…The physical characteristics, geometric features and morphological signs of the anatomical structure in MRI images of the knee joint are the key factors in the evaluation of articular cartilage degeneration [ 14 ] and secondary bone hyperplasia [ 15 ]. The gray mean and standard deviation of the segmentation area are selected as physical indexes.…”

Patients With First-Time or Recurrent Patellar Dislocation Have a Similar High Rate and Extent of Articular Cartilage Injury Observed on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

“…Moreover, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Xará-Leite et al. 11 found MRI to be clinically reliable in detecting articular cartilage damage after patellar dislocation.…”