1987
DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(87)90303-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging: Lumbosacral lipoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic differences between different regions in the brain were minimized by comparing relaxation times from similar areas in patients and controls. The calculation of the intrinsic tissue parameters TI and T2 from MR images has been described in previous publications in which the emphasis was on tissue characterization (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). T1 and T2 values are not significantly affected by blood pressure, smoking, alcohol, medications, dietary habits, and demographic factors, and are only slightly correlated with age ( 14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic differences between different regions in the brain were minimized by comparing relaxation times from similar areas in patients and controls. The calculation of the intrinsic tissue parameters TI and T2 from MR images has been described in previous publications in which the emphasis was on tissue characterization (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). T1 and T2 values are not significantly affected by blood pressure, smoking, alcohol, medications, dietary habits, and demographic factors, and are only slightly correlated with age ( 14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated anomalies such as syringomyelia is also clearly demonstrated. However the exact relationships of the lipoma and nerve roots are impossible to assess because of the lack of visualization of the nerve roots with this technique [8]. However in our experience, transverse sections define the lateral extension of the lipoma allowing (to a certain extent) us, to forsee the surgical difficulties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although differences exist between mean relaxation parameters for tumor and normal tissues -that allow classical MRI sequences to detect tumors -the overlap in parameter range has resulted in the failure of attempts to employ individual parameters (proton density, T 1 or T 2 ) as a quantitative diagnostic marker or to define individual tissues by their native relaxation properties or proton density. [5][6][7][8] This difference does, however, allow tumor detection on MRI by visual inspection of the difference in T 1 , T 2 , T 2 * or proton density from surrounding normal tissue, a difference that may be variably marked or subtle. In Figure 19.1, images are shown from a patient with an aggressive primary brain Figure 19.1 Computerized tomography and MR images of a left temporal lobe glioblastoma multiforme in a 47-year-old man.…”
Section: Clinical Use Of ''Weighted'' Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%