2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13244-016-0482-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging of breast augmentation: a pictorial review

Abstract: The increasing prevalence of breast augmentation presents new challenges in breast imaging interpretation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recognized as the gold standard for the evaluation of augmented breasts. This article reviews the MRI features of different breast augmentation techniques, their associated complications, and the role of MRI in the assessment of concurrent breast abnormalities.Teaching Points• MRI has the highest sensitivity and specificity for implant rupture detection.• MRI is able to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate test to assess integrity of implants. 60 Silicone specific,T1 and T2 sequences clearly demonstrate intra and extracapsular rupture (see Figure 10). Nonetheless, clinical guidance is necessary to determine the benefit of MRI.…”
Section: Implant Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate test to assess integrity of implants. 60 Silicone specific,T1 and T2 sequences clearly demonstrate intra and extracapsular rupture (see Figure 10). Nonetheless, clinical guidance is necessary to determine the benefit of MRI.…”
Section: Implant Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This layer, in circular arrangement, exerts traction on the implant and determines signs and symptoms ranging from discomfort or breast stiffening sensation to continuous and refractory pain, with possible loss of mobility and aesthetic deformity 1 . Capsular contracture may occur at any moment after surgery and this condition is diagnosed clinically, as mentioned above, but imaging tests are usually requested for diagnostic confirmation 2 .…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has to be considered that small asymmetries which can be seen on clinical examination or are mentioned by the patient may go undetected with imaging alone. Increased number of radial folds is described regularly as a finding of capsular contracture [2][3][4][5][6]. With contracture of the fibrous capsule, the surface for the extension of the implant is diminished and radial folds occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With contracture of the fibrous capsule, the surface for the extension of the implant is diminished and radial folds occur. The diagnostic problem is that some radial folds are regarded as normal findings after breast implants, and no study reports about a possible distinction between a normal and a pathological number of folds [2][3][4][5][6]. If augmentation has been performed bilaterally, the number of folds can be compared and a difference in the number of radial folds can be interpreted as a sign of capsular contracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation