2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00309.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Femoral Head of Normal Dogs and Dogs With Avascular Necrosis

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to describe the appearance of the femoral head of normal, young, small breed dogs, and dogs with avascular necrosis using low-field (0.3 T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Images of the femoral heads were obtained in the dorsal plane, and included T1-weighted spin-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, fast spin echo-inversion recovery, and fluid attenuated inversion recovery pulse sequences. MR imaging features of the asymptomatic femoral heads and necks included uniform high signal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior human and animal studies have demonstrated that decreased MRI signal intensity in femoral AVN is nonspecific, reflecting a variety of histologic changes such as fat necrosis, inflammatory infiltration, marrow fibrosis, neovascularization, and lamellar bone formation, and that these tissue characteristics vary over time. 146 147 148 149 The clinical relevance of our result regarding noncontrast MRI is therefore uncertain, but may represent selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Prior human and animal studies have demonstrated that decreased MRI signal intensity in femoral AVN is nonspecific, reflecting a variety of histologic changes such as fat necrosis, inflammatory infiltration, marrow fibrosis, neovascularization, and lamellar bone formation, and that these tissue characteristics vary over time. 146 147 148 149 The clinical relevance of our result regarding noncontrast MRI is therefore uncertain, but may represent selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Contrast-enhanced images obtained in this phase may appear to show enhancement and, as a result, may be less informative about the vascular status [11]. One animal study also reported variable ap-pearances within bone after administration of contrast medium, with some "normal" femoral heads apparently not enhancing, whereas avascular femoral heads typically showed inhomogeneous enhancement [12]. In total, these studies describing apparent enhancement in pathologically confirmed areas of osteonecrosis raise the possibility that routine conventional contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging may be unreliable in determining the vascular status of the proximal pole of the scaphoid in patients with fracture nonunions.…”
Section: Fox Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe cases may compromise hind limb usage, locomotion and subsequent no weight bearing at all on the hind limb (Nebzydoski, 1982;Jones, 1985). The diagnosis is based on imaging such as radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (Nebzydoski, 1982;Jones, 1985;Bowlus et al, 2008). Radiographic findings may reveal enlargement at early stages and a flattening or collapse of the femoral head at late stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%