2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displacement in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is necessary to develop a standardized diagnostic standard and classification method for TMD through systematic and well-designed research56. The following are the most mutually agreed upon opinions among scholars57585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103.…”
Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to develop a standardized diagnostic standard and classification method for TMD through systematic and well-designed research56. The following are the most mutually agreed upon opinions among scholars57585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103.…”
Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Therefore, we only included patients with TMJ DD to evaluate differences in dentofacial characteristics between patients with large and small CR-MI discrepancies, excluding the effect of TMJ DD on dentofacial characteristics (Table 4). No dentofacial characteristics were significantly different for the MI position between patients with large and small CR-MI discrepancies, although all the patients included in this study showed backward positioning and rotation of the ramus and mandible compared to the Korean norm (Tables 3 and 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the fact that TMJ DD is associated with skeletal Class II with hyperdivergent patterns, 13,14,20 and all the patients included in this study had TMJ DD, regardless of CR-MI discrepancy. All of these findings suggest that it is not easy to discriminate between patients with large CR-MI discrepancy and those with small CR-MI discrepancy only in the MI position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to disharmony between the upper and lower jaws in the anteroposterior direction, problems of the width of the basal arch, deficient perimeter, and subsequent tooth crowding must be considered. Furthermore, temporomandibular joint disorders, ranging from mere disk displacement to degenerative bone changes [3, 4], are also frequently seen in these patients compared to those with other skeletal patterns. Among these problems, the axis of the mandibular incisors has not tended to attract much interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%