2009
DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gadolinium Arthrography to Assess Acetabular Cartilage Delamination

Abstract: Recent reports have demonstrated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a promising technique in detecting articular cartilage lesions of the hip joint. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI with gadolinium arthrography in detecting acetabular cartilage delamination in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain. 46 patients (48 hips) underwent surgical dislocation of the hip. Mean age was 38.8 (range 17-56). There were 26 males and 20 females. All patients had Magnetic Resonance Ima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…84, 134 Currently, the most common imaging procedure used to confirm the diagnosis of intra-articular pathology, such as labral tears or chondral lesions is MRA. 77, 210 Contrast is injected into the hip joint to allow better visualization of the intra-articular structures. Compared to the gold standard of arthroscopic visual inspection, MRA has a sensitivity of 71% to 100% 18, 39, 59, 89 and a specificity of 44% to 71% 39, 89 in detecting a labral tear.…”
Section: Clinical Guidelines: Impairment/function-based Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84, 134 Currently, the most common imaging procedure used to confirm the diagnosis of intra-articular pathology, such as labral tears or chondral lesions is MRA. 77, 210 Contrast is injected into the hip joint to allow better visualization of the intra-articular structures. Compared to the gold standard of arthroscopic visual inspection, MRA has a sensitivity of 71% to 100% 18, 39, 59, 89 and a specificity of 44% to 71% 39, 89 in detecting a labral tear.…”
Section: Clinical Guidelines: Impairment/function-based Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63(NR)/33(NR)139 58 to 81/69 to 100140 50 to 79(NR)/77 to 84(NR)141 49 to 67(NR)/76 to 92(NR)142 97(82 to 99)/84(60 to 97)20…”
Section: Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). However, magnetic resonance imaging is required to evaluate the labrum and articular cartilage [10]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%