2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance–invisible Versus Magnetic Resonance–visible Prostate Cancer in Active Surveillance: A Preliminary Report on Disease Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For men with newly diagnosed PCa, the presence of MRI-discernable lesions has been suggested as an adverse prognostic characteristic particularly for men initiating management with AS, where retrospective studies have suggested an increased risk for disease Association of MRI and genomic profiling in men with prostate cancer reclassification due to changes in tumor volume estimates [22]. As MRI studies incorporate multiple sequences believed to reflect anatomic, tumor vascularity, and cellularity it is not known whether higher rates of upgrading reflect improved sampling associated with larger tumors in some men or the occurrence of genuine biological progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For men with newly diagnosed PCa, the presence of MRI-discernable lesions has been suggested as an adverse prognostic characteristic particularly for men initiating management with AS, where retrospective studies have suggested an increased risk for disease Association of MRI and genomic profiling in men with prostate cancer reclassification due to changes in tumor volume estimates [22]. As MRI studies incorporate multiple sequences believed to reflect anatomic, tumor vascularity, and cellularity it is not known whether higher rates of upgrading reflect improved sampling associated with larger tumors in some men or the occurrence of genuine biological progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some more recent studies that had not been included in this meta-analysis have confirmed these results. [11][12][13][14][15] One evaluated 392 patients on AS, with the absence of a focal/dominant lesion on baseline multiparametric MRI documented in 208 (53.1%) cases. 11 Of those, 193 (93%) did not have high-grade cancer on confirmatory biopsy.…”
Section: The Significance Of a ''Negative'' Prostate Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of 96 patients on AS, of those with a negative base-line MRI (n ¼ 12), only 1 patient was found to have adverse pathology on confirmatory biopsy. 12 In another study, DWI-MR images from 117 potential AS candidates were rated on a 5-point Likert scale and the negative predictive value of a score 2 or less was 96.5%. 13 Another group sequentially performed transrectal prostate biopsy, multiparametric prostate MRI (ie, T2-weighted imaging, DWI, and DCE), as well as template-guided prostate mapping biopsy with a median of 48 cores in 194 patients with low-risk PCa.…”
Section: The Significance Of a ''Negative'' Prostate Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients diagnosed with low risk prostate cancer as detected by TRUS-guided biopsy, mpMRI can be used to identify those patients who may actually have higher risk/grade disease and thus, would be inappropriate candidates for active surveillance [31,32]. Tumors that are not visible or are of low suspicion on mpMRI are less likely to have adverse pathology [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: The Role Of Mpmri In Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%