2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1075-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the majority of patients undergo pelvic CT and MRI scanning while determining preoperative staging, radiological pelvimetry is not yet considered an important technique for quantifying the difficulty of laparoscopic procedures [18,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority of patients undergo pelvic CT and MRI scanning while determining preoperative staging, radiological pelvimetry is not yet considered an important technique for quantifying the difficulty of laparoscopic procedures [18,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Killeen et al [5] introduced our study as supportive of their findings, indeed, we came to different conclusions [6]. We showed by multivariate analysis that narrower pelvic outlet together with higher body mass index, shorter tumor distance from the anal verge, and advanced tumor depth was independently predictive of longer operative time in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique (DST) anastomosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In the December issue of Surgical Endoscopy, Killeen et al [5] examined the influence of pelvic dimensions measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on difficulties in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Operative time was used as a measurement of operative difficulty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These diameters and their relationships will be helpful in assessing the possibility of a favourable outcome in vaginal deliveries. They will also be useful when surgical procedures in both sexes are planned, as a small pelvic canal, for example, may impede vision, access and space for surgical excision (Hong et al, 2007;Killeen et al, 2010;Salerno et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%