2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-009-0623-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance plaque imaging to predict the occurrence of the slow-flow phenomenon in carotid artery stenting procedures

Abstract: Vulnerable carotid plaques have a significantly higher risk of slow-flow phenomenon than stable plaques. The occurrence of the slow-flow phenomenon can be predicted by MR plaque imaging before CAS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In their study, slow-flow phenomena occurred in 10 of 31 CAS procedures, and 7 of 10 slow-flow phenomena were observed in patients with carotid IPH, revealed by multicontrast MR plaque imaging. We observed no slow-flow phenomena in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…21 In their study, slow-flow phenomena occurred in 10 of 31 CAS procedures, and 7 of 10 slow-flow phenomena were observed in patients with carotid IPH, revealed by multicontrast MR plaque imaging. We observed no slow-flow phenomena in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3 Various evaluation methods for plaque vulnerability have been reported; 11,23,28 evaluation using signal intensity on carotid artery MRI is also used in clinical practice 14,25 and is useful for identification of high-risk lesions. 13,19 Recent technological developments in MRI equipment and imaging sequencing make it possible to assess the carotid plaque components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the CEA high risk case with vulnerable plaque, PercuSurge guardwire system was used since filter obstruction tends to occur in vulnerable plaque and may result in stroke [2,17]. The amount of debris was evaluated with area since the thickness of the debris was not able to measured on the slide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%