1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002340050565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance signal intensity and volume changes after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms causing mass effect

Abstract: To determine when and how intracranial aneurysms causing mass effect change following endovascular treatment, we used MRI to assess patients for 2-3 years after the interventional procedure. Nine patients who had aneurysms compressing the surrounding structures underwent endovascular treatment. Proximal occlusion of the parent artery was performed in seven cases, and in two the aneurysm was embolised with microcoils. After embolisation, signal intensity within aneurysms tended to be high on both T1- and T2-wei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome of endovascular treatment of giant CCAAs is promising. tial volume after 18 months of endosaccular coiling has been reported 27 . Gruber et al 28 reported that 45.5% of patients with symptoms of neural compression improved after endosaccular embolization of giant and very large aneurysms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of endovascular treatment of giant CCAAs is promising. tial volume after 18 months of endosaccular coiling has been reported 27 . Gruber et al 28 reported that 45.5% of patients with symptoms of neural compression improved after endosaccular embolization of giant and very large aneurysms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Shrinkage of approximately 57% of initial volume after 18 months of endosaccular coiling has also been reported. 20 Based on these results, mass effect symptoms will probably improve with the shrinkage of aneurysms after embolization. In our series, 69% of our patients presenting with symptoms of …”
Section: Mass Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5,6) Additional endosaccular coil placement in the recanalized aneurysm should not be performed because of the risk of worsening the mass effect on the brainstem. 6,10) Neural compression due to GDCs in combination with the``water-hammer'' effect from the parent artery blood flow may have caused the neurological deterioration and progressive midbrain edema in our patient. 3) Worsening mass effect resulting from a coilthrombus complex may be successfully treated by BA occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%