2018
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-225364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective option for refractory duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux following Billroth II gastrectomy

Abstract: Bile reflux into the gastric stump and then into the oesophagus is a common event after distal gastrectomy and Billroth II reconstruction. In addition to typical symptoms of nausea, epigastric pain and bile vomiting, acid reflux can also occur in patients with concomitant hiatus hernia and lower oesophageal sphincter incompetency. Diverting the bile away from the oesophagus by conversion into a Roux-en-Y anastomosis or by completion gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy have so far represented the main… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). A total of 39 full‐text papers, published between 2008 and 2019, were finally included. The 39 articles consisted of one RCT, five comparative cohort studies (2 prospective and 3 retrospective), three comparative case–control studies, 25 case series (14 prospective, 11 retrospective) and five case reports ( Fig .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). A total of 39 full‐text papers, published between 2008 and 2019, were finally included. The 39 articles consisted of one RCT, five comparative cohort studies (2 prospective and 3 retrospective), three comparative case–control studies, 25 case series (14 prospective, 11 retrospective) and five case reports ( Fig .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty‐one followed the FDA eligibility criteria for MSA insertion. Seven, comprising a total of 427 patients and published after FDA approval, extended these criteria to include patients with a hiatus hernia greater than 3 cm or previous gastrointestinal surgery, to assess whether the device could be used in this population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these patients, Case 1 is included in the systematic review. 10 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who underwent MSA implant for primary (n = 63) or persistent/de novo (n = 4) GERD after gastric surgery during the same time period (October 2017 to December 2018) were compared. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were similar except for a statistically significant greater prevalence of grade-B esophagitis ( P = .014), operative time ( P = .000, CI = 67.6–87.9), size of MSA ( P = .046, CI = 14.8–15.2), and length of stay ( P = .038, CI = 2.3–2.7) in patients with prior gastric surgery ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As safety and efficacy of this technique became evident in clinical practice, indications for MSA have gradually expanded after Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2012 to include patients with large hiatal hernia, Barrett's esophagus, and severe symptoms/complications following previous gastric surgery. 610 Persistent or de novo GERD after gastric and bariatric surgery may be difficult to manage given the altered anatomy, unavailability of gastric fundus to perform a fundoplication, and the concern of morbidity associated to diversion procedures such as the Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass (RYGB). 1112 Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has now become the most common surgical procedure for obesity, with the percentage among bariatric operations increasing from 17.8% in 2011 to 53.8% in 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%