2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.014407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic structure and anisotropy of[Co/Pd]5/NiFemultilayers

Abstract: The magnetization behavior, magnetic anisotropy and domain congurations of Co/Pd multilayers with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy capped with permalloy is investigated using magnetometry, magnetic force microscopy and ferromagnetic resonance. The thickness of the Ni80Fe20 layer in [Co/Pd]5/NiFe(t) was varied from t = 0 nm to 80 nm in order to study the interplay between the anisotropy and magnetization directions of the Co/Pd and the NiFe. By varying the thickness of the NiFe layer the net anisotropy changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a fully perpendicular STNO, such as that assumed in the original prediction of droplets [40], would have the lowest nucleation current, it would on the other hand also not have any output signal, since the symmetry of the magnetodynamics would not generate a time-varying STNO resistance. Instead we argue that a fixed layer based on tilted anisotropy materials [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] would be ideal for droplet nucleation and operation. In Fig.…”
Section: Magnetic Droplet Nucleation Current Vs Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a fully perpendicular STNO, such as that assumed in the original prediction of droplets [40], would have the lowest nucleation current, it would on the other hand also not have any output signal, since the symmetry of the magnetodynamics would not generate a time-varying STNO resistance. Instead we argue that a fixed layer based on tilted anisotropy materials [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] would be ideal for droplet nucleation and operation. In Fig.…”
Section: Magnetic Droplet Nucleation Current Vs Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…such as Scanning Probe Microscopy [17], Lorentz transmission electron microscopy [14][15], and magnetic-force microscopy [6,9], et al [13,[18][19][20], were used to the detection of magnetic bubbles in ultrathin films. The formation of magnetic bubble depends on some factors [9,26], such as the quality factor 2 2 / s u M K Q   (the ratio of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and magnetostatic energies). If Q>1, the stripe domains are formed in magnetic films.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the soft NiFe and hard [Co/Pd]4 layers[25][26]: exchange constant VSM measurement. To ensure the labyrinth domain in Py layer, an effective non-zero perpendicular magnetic anisotropy K is taken…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferromagnetic domains formed in the Co/Pd will dictate the formation of AFM domains in Cr 2 O 3 as well as the net averaged exchange bias field, H EB . Domain sizes in Co/Pd multilayers vary widely and are highly dependent on the thickness of the individual Co and Pd layers, the number of repeats, the seed layer, and the growth conditions . Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) scans (Figure b and Figure S3‐1, Supporting Information) of our exchange biased sample in a demagnetized state shows the presence of stripe domains, a pattern characteristic of perpendicular anisotropy Co/Pt and Co/Pd multilayers system, with a median domain width ≈350 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%