The polynuclear coordination compounds [Co II 3 Co III 2 (Hbda) 2 (bda) 2 (ib) 6 ]$2MeCN (1) and [Ni II 4 (Hbda) 3 (ib) 5 (MeCN)] (2) (H 2 bda ¼ N-butyldiethanolamine, ib ¼ isobutyrate) are prepared under aerobic conditions using an identical synthetic protocol that solely differs in the employed transition metal (Co II vs. Ni II ). Whereas compound 1 displays a mixed-valent, pentanuclear, horseshoe-shaped structure with alternating Co(II) and Co(III) ions, compound 2 presents a tetrahedrally-shaped Ni(II) structural motif where four nickel centers are bridged by three O atoms to afford a lacunary Ni 4 O 3 cubane, a motif hitherto only observed as a substructure of higher-nuclearity coordination clusters and polyoxometalates. Both compounds are thermally surprisingly stable (>130 C). 1 exhibits weak antiferromagnetic exchange interactions; 2 shows a ferromagnetic coupled triangle of three Ni centers interacting antiferromagnetically with a single Ni apex. Fig. 4 Temperature dependence of c m T at 0.1 T of compound 2; inset: molar magnetization M m vs. B at 2.0 K: experimental data (open circles), least-squares fit (red solid lines).This journal is