1993
DOI: 10.1109/77.233464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic susceptibility imaging for nondestructive evaluation (using SQUID magnetometer)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three-dimensional methods of MST have not been implemented, but the analytical groundwork for the method has been developed [42, 43]. Further developments of MST for biological imaging [44], non-destructive evaluation (NDE) [45], diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects [46] and in a non-uniform magnetic field [47] have also been reported. Models including a system of voxels containing magnetically susceptible material, an array of excitation coils, and an array of sensors have been developed for magnetic relaxometry [48] and brain hemodynamics [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional methods of MST have not been implemented, but the analytical groundwork for the method has been developed [42, 43]. Further developments of MST for biological imaging [44], non-destructive evaluation (NDE) [45], diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects [46] and in a non-uniform magnetic field [47] have also been reported. Models including a system of voxels containing magnetically susceptible material, an array of excitation coils, and an array of sensors have been developed for magnetic relaxometry [48] and brain hemodynamics [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest is to measure the DC magnetic moment as a function of position. A more powerful technique is to apply a DC magnetic field to the sample and map the susceptibility [2]. An alternative solution is to induce an eddy current response from the sample by using a very low power, low frequency driving magnetic field [3].…”
Section: Instrument Desi~nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 For investigations of diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects, an imaging susceptometer based on SQUID that exposes an object to dc magnetic fields has been reported. 22,23 In the case of ferromagnetic metal NDE, the secondary magnetic field is caused not only by eddy currents but also by the focused magnetic flux based on high permeability. In order to distinguish between these phenomena, we have developed an imaging system capable of detecting and analyzing three-dimensional secondary magnetic field components utilizing a large area primary magnetic field exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%