1997
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910370404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: Magnetic susceptibility of bone.

Abstract: Measurements of the volume magnetic susceptibility of solids using the classical Gouy balance approach are hampered by variations in apparent density of the packed powder. In this paper a quantitative NMR measurement of the volume magnetic susceptibility of powdered solids is described and the volume susceptibility of bone is reported. The technique is based on the measurement of changes in incremental linewidth (1/pi T2') induced in a marker fluid whose susceptibility can be predictably modified by changing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
133
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computed and experimental field maps were found to be in excellent agreement with one another. Lastly, from the slopes of regression between the experimental and computed fields, the absolute volume susceptibility of bone was nondestructively determined as À11.0 Â 10 À6 (SI), which is in close agreement with a reported value of À11.3 Â 10 À6 obtained with the previously discussed spectroscopic susceptibility matching technique (34).…”
Section: Nature Of the Susceptibility-induced Fieldsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Computed and experimental field maps were found to be in excellent agreement with one another. Lastly, from the slopes of regression between the experimental and computed fields, the absolute volume susceptibility of bone was nondestructively determined as À11.0 Â 10 À6 (SI), which is in close agreement with a reported value of À11.3 Â 10 À6 obtained with the previously discussed spectroscopic susceptibility matching technique (34).…”
Section: Nature Of the Susceptibility-induced Fieldsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The values are, however, in agreement with the reported susceptibility value of animal fat (−7.79 × 10 −6 ) [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is expected that the resonances for these environments are predominantly broadened by the microscopic magnetic field inhomogeneities at the interface between the surface of the carbon particles that are embedded in the electrode film, and the liquid-filled voids between them (the electrode films also contain a small amount of PTFE binder, which will have a slight influence on the effects discussed here but with no charge dependence). Importantly, the magnitude of the broadening is directly proportional to the difference between the susceptibilities of the solid and liquid media 36 , in this case between the carbon particles and the electrolyte solution inside the electrodes. On charging, electrons are added or removed from the electronic structure of the carbon, thereby changing its susceptibility, and therefore the linewidths of the SA and WA peaks.…”
Section: Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%