1989
DOI: 10.1063/1.1140646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic susceptibility of some materials used for apparatus construction (at 295 K)

Abstract: The magnetic susceptibility, X, at 295 K of a wide variety of common laboratory construction materials has been carefully measured. Only materials with well-characterized compositions are included in the final data. Materials such as eu alloys and fined epoxies showing ferromagneticlike saturation behavior are listed with the recognition that workers will probably want to use these with great caution in precision experiments where magnetic effects may be a source of error. Susceptibility values are given for o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
22
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the values, we added the literature value of the susceptibility of water at 20 • C, -9.032 ppm [1], to our results, assuming that the uncertainty of that value is negligible compared to our accuracy. The the comparison to [9] in table 7 show a good agreement within the uncertainties of their measurement, except for the value of N-BK7 vs. BK7. We presume that what is referred to as BK7 in [9] is indeed the "old style" BK7 or another glass with the same optical properties from a different manufacturer, not N-BK7, and may thus have a significantly different susceptibility as we also observed in the dense flint glasses.…”
Section: Comparison To the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To compare the values, we added the literature value of the susceptibility of water at 20 • C, -9.032 ppm [1], to our results, assuming that the uncertainty of that value is negligible compared to our accuracy. The the comparison to [9] in table 7 show a good agreement within the uncertainties of their measurement, except for the value of N-BK7 vs. BK7. We presume that what is referred to as BK7 in [9] is indeed the "old style" BK7 or another glass with the same optical properties from a different manufacturer, not N-BK7, and may thus have a significantly different susceptibility as we also observed in the dense flint glasses.…”
Section: Comparison To the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The the comparison to [9] in table 7 show a good agreement within the uncertainties of their measurement, except for the value of N-BK7 vs. BK7. We presume that what is referred to as BK7 in [9] is indeed the "old style" BK7 or another glass with the same optical properties from a different manufacturer, not N-BK7, and may thus have a significantly different susceptibility as we also observed in the dense flint glasses.…”
Section: Comparison To the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations