2023
DOI: 10.1007/s42114-023-00687-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetically activated 3D printable polylactic acid/polycaprolactone/magnetite composites for magnetic induction heating generation

Abstract: Additive manufacturing technology has attracted the attention of industrial and technological sectors due to the versatility of the design and the easy manufacture of structural and functional elements based on composite materials. The embedding of magnetic nanoparticles in the polymeric matrix enables the development of an easy manufacturing process of low-cost magnetically active novel polymeric composites. In this work, we report a series of magnetic composites prepared by solution casting method combining … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A considerable shift of the PCL decomposition to lower temperatures is, in turn, observed as a consequence of the addition of MPs. This is in accordance with previous results [31,42,43] where the increase in the pyrolysis of PCL chains has been ascribed to the limitation of the movement of polymeric chains caused by the incorporation of magnetic particles. Nevertheless, the composite decomposition is well above the usual printing temperatures in FDM 3D printing, so no influence whatsoever is expected in any elaboration or operation step.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A considerable shift of the PCL decomposition to lower temperatures is, in turn, observed as a consequence of the addition of MPs. This is in accordance with previous results [31,42,43] where the increase in the pyrolysis of PCL chains has been ascribed to the limitation of the movement of polymeric chains caused by the incorporation of magnetic particles. Nevertheless, the composite decomposition is well above the usual printing temperatures in FDM 3D printing, so no influence whatsoever is expected in any elaboration or operation step.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As indicated, the very large endothermic peak observed around 330 K corresponds to the melting of the PCL matrix whereas the exothermic one around 300 K is linked to the polymer crystallization taking place on subsequent cooling. The calculated enthalpies for melting and crystallization in the composite are 25.0 J/g and 26.4 J/g, respectively, which in both cases represent around 38% of the pure PCL enthalpies (∆𝐻 𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑡 𝑃𝐶𝐿 = 66𝐽/𝑔 and ∆𝐻 𝑐𝑟𝑦𝑠𝑡 𝑃𝐶𝐿 = 69𝐽/𝑔 [31]), a slightly higher value than the nominal 30% PCL weight concentration. On the other hand, the much smaller enthalpy change associated to the MT in the metallic MPs (~ 20 times lower) makes the corresponding peaks to be hardly detected in the thermogram.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that the heterogeneous nucleation effect enhances the crystallization ability of the PLA/PCL composite. 62,63 In the heating curve (B), the PLA curve exhibits a double melting peak, where the lower melting peak is attributed to the incomplete melting of the α 0 crystals due to a slow heating rate. 41 The melting temperatures (T m ) of PCL and PLA in the PLA/PCL composite do not show significant variations compared to their respective pure components, indicating that the fatty chains of PCL exhibit better thermal stability in the presence of other polymers and particles.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Dsc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional (3D) printing, or additive manufacturing (AM) technology, creates physical objects from 3D models, usually layer-upon-layer patterns . This technology can quickly fabricate micro-to-macro-scale freestanding 3D structures without mold using single or multiple materials. , Depending on the materials, various AM techniques can be selected for fabricating 3D structures, including fused deposition molding (FDM), extrusion printing (EP), inkjet bioprinting, and powder fusion printing. FDM and EP are the most attractive for printing thermoplastic, thermoset, and biopolymer composites among different AM techniques. In FDM, thermoplastic filaments of polycarbonates, polylactic acid, and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene melt at the nozzle into a semiliquid state and are extruded in a layerwise pattern to fabricate 3D structures. , In contrast, EP techniques can print precisely various materials, including thermosets and highly viscous wood-derived polymers such as nanocellulose under ambient conditions in a layerwise pattern …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%