2015
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/4/045502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetically-refreshable receptor platform structures for reusable nano-biosensor chips

Abstract: We developed a magnetically-refreshable receptor platform structure which can be integrated with quite versatile nano-biosensor structures to build reusable nano-biosensor chips. This structure allows one to easily remove used receptor molecules from a biosensor surface and reuse the biosensor for repeated sensing operations. Using this structure, we demonstrated reusable immunofluorescence biosensors. Significantly, since our method allows one to place receptor molecules very close to a nano-biosensor surface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that previous optical tweezer experiments with a similar small surface coverage resulted in a rather small distribution of the measured data close to our results, we can expect the multivalency effect in our experiment did not significantly increase the distribution of our data. [23,41] Furthermore, in AFM or optical tweezer measurements, the unbinding force rate during the Kd measurement can significantly affect the measured data, often resulting in a rather large distribution in the measured data. [42] However, the force applied to the bead during the release step in our experiments was estimated as only ~1 pN which was much smaller that the common unbinding forces of about 50-100 pN between abag and should not break the specific bindings between the beads and sensor surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that previous optical tweezer experiments with a similar small surface coverage resulted in a rather small distribution of the measured data close to our results, we can expect the multivalency effect in our experiment did not significantly increase the distribution of our data. [23,41] Furthermore, in AFM or optical tweezer measurements, the unbinding force rate during the Kd measurement can significantly affect the measured data, often resulting in a rather large distribution in the measured data. [42] However, the force applied to the bead during the release step in our experiments was estimated as only ~1 pN which was much smaller that the common unbinding forces of about 50-100 pN between abag and should not break the specific bindings between the beads and sensor surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we generated magnetic fields following these four steps: an upward magnetic field (150 mT), a downward magnetic field (35 mT), a downward magnetic field (150 mT), and an upward magnetic field (35 mT) for the 1 st trap, 1 st release, 2 nd trap, and 2 nd release of magnetic nanobeads. The strengths of applied magnetic fields were determined to achieve an efficient trapping and a clean release during the repeated cycles [23]. The movement and distribution of magnetic beads were recorded by the fluorescence microscope.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures For the Magnetic Trap-and-release Cycmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniformly controlled Ni patterns evenly deflect an applied external magnetic field. As a result, they can hold magnetic particles without a large aggregation (Yoo et al, 2016).…”
Section: Characterization Of a Spr Sensor Chip With Ferromagnetic Ni Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tube was cut vertically to reveal a small cross-section; a thin-layer membrane was then attached to the surface. [15,16] Preparation of a thin polymer membrane for the cross-section of the electrode First, 50 mg of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) powder, 50 mg of ionophore, and a specific amount of kaolinite-type pyrite cinder (KTPC) from the Iberian pyrite belt (IPB) were mixed with 75 mg of plasticizer. The resulting mixture was then dissolved in 5 mL of tetrahydrofuran in a 25-mm-thick glass beaker.…”
Section: Sensor Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the potential difference between two successive dilutions was less than 59 mV, then the sensor was not sensitive enough to detect the presence of exotoxin. [16] Reliability and lifetime of the sensor In this study, the sensor lifetime was determined by how long each MIP sensor could maintain its diagnostic properties. In addition, the sensors were also evaluated for their ability to detect the exotoxin within a given period.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%