1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00914508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetische Messungen im System Fe?Te

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Q value is slightly less than the Q value 0.974Å −1 at the commensurate position (1,0,1) M , which is likely due to the variation of the magnetic form factor as well as a possible variation of the magnetic structure factor. However, one has to be vigilant for impurity phases [34,36]. For example, we can clearly see the strong (1,1,0) cubic Fe impurity peaks in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Q value is slightly less than the Q value 0.974Å −1 at the commensurate position (1,0,1) M , which is likely due to the variation of the magnetic form factor as well as a possible variation of the magnetic structure factor. However, one has to be vigilant for impurity phases [34,36]. For example, we can clearly see the strong (1,1,0) cubic Fe impurity peaks in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these data, we estimate that the latent heat of the phase transition is ∼215 J/mol, meaning a change of entropy of ∆S ∼ 3.2 J/(mol·K) through the transition. If we assume that the Fe moment in FeTe is about 3.87 µ B in the paramagnetic state [34] and 1.7 µ B below T N , the change of the entropy across the transition based on an Ising model is about 3.5 J/(mol·K). This result suggests that the major contribution to the entropy change at the phase transition arises from the spin ordering, which supports the view that the first order phase transition is driven by the magnetism [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q value is slightly less than the Q value 0.974 Å−1 at the commensurate position (1,0,1) M , which is likely due to the variation of the magnetic form factor as well as a possible variation of the magnetic structure factor. However, one has to be vigilant for impurity phases [34,36]. For example, we can clearly see the strong (1,1,0) cubic Fe impurity peaks in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%