Graphene 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9783527651122.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetism of Nanographene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[28], both approaches have the same limit of validity of approximately −2.0 eV to 1.5 eV, when it is compared with the tight-binding results. Similar mismatch is observed for the graphene nanoribbon case, such that the analytic solution based on the boundary conditions described by Brey 29 does not match in higher energy range 30,31 . By analyzing the set of equations (17), one can see that by rewriting them in terms of δ i and z, with i = 1, 2, they lead to the condition exp(2zW ) = 1, resulting in a pure imaginary z, as obtained in the first case.…”
Section: Armchair Phosphorene Nanoribbonsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[28], both approaches have the same limit of validity of approximately −2.0 eV to 1.5 eV, when it is compared with the tight-binding results. Similar mismatch is observed for the graphene nanoribbon case, such that the analytic solution based on the boundary conditions described by Brey 29 does not match in higher energy range 30,31 . By analyzing the set of equations (17), one can see that by rewriting them in terms of δ i and z, with i = 1, 2, they lead to the condition exp(2zW ) = 1, resulting in a pure imaginary z, as obtained in the first case.…”
Section: Armchair Phosphorene Nanoribbonsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…7,8,20,21 A series of recent studies have obtained the electronic dispersion using approaches such as first principles calculations 14,16,[22][23][24] , tight-binding model 22,25 , k · p methods 26,27 , and a longwavelength approximation 28 . Following the example of graphene nanoribbons [29][30][31] , one can expect that the electronic spectrum and the transport properties of narrow phosphorene ribbons can be significantly distinct from the case of an infinite sample. Recent studies of BPNs have been based on a tight-binding approach [32][33][34] and via first-principles simulations 23,24,35 that, while giving reasonably precise results for small structures, can become computationally expensive for larger structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to observe these interesting phenomena, several techniques have been designed by experimentalists to examine these propositions. 17 In this report, we show the effect of edge modification on the magnetic states of exfoliated graphite (EG) which mainly consists of twisted bi and tri-layered graphene. The different magnetic contributions in graphene have been separated using low field (LF)-high field (HF) hysteresis loops so as to emphasize the effect of interactions that induce FM behavior in it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hubbard model and density functional theory calculations support the formation of spin polarized edge states. 17 There could be an intra or interzigzag interaction resulting in a FM or AFM state. 17,26 The AFM state is due to the conduction p-electrons mediating the spin polarized zigzag edge state spins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation