2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023gc011103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetite in Muong Nong‐Type Australasian Tektites From South China

Qing Pan,
Zhiyong Xiao,
Yanxue Wu
et al.

Abstract: South China belongs to the northern geographic branch of the Australasian strewn field (AASF) of tektites and microtektites, and this area is assumed to be part of the uprange region of the putative impactor trajectory that formed the yet undiscovered source crater. Ferromagnetic minerals in impact glass may record the magnetization process and thermal history of impact melt, but the possible identity of ferromagnetic minerals in AASF tektites from South China is elusive. Here, we perform a rock magnetism and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were not formed by deposition of Fe‐S rich impact ejecta in degassing pits either, considering that iron‐rich particles with comparable sizes and compositions are not visible elsewhere on surfaces of impact glasses in the Chang'E‐5 regolith (Yan et al., 2022a) or reported earlier in Apollo samples. On the other hand, chemical compositions and crystallography of the interior substances suggest that these features are most consistent with being formed due to immiscibility between Fe‐S rich melt and silicate melt during cooling (Hamann et al., 2018; McKay et al., 1970; Pan et al., 2023). The circular rimless depressions are consistent with being margins of solidified troilite, as volume shrinkage during cooling and the different cooling rates between Fe‐S melt and the surrounding silicate melt yielded partially detached margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They were not formed by deposition of Fe‐S rich impact ejecta in degassing pits either, considering that iron‐rich particles with comparable sizes and compositions are not visible elsewhere on surfaces of impact glasses in the Chang'E‐5 regolith (Yan et al., 2022a) or reported earlier in Apollo samples. On the other hand, chemical compositions and crystallography of the interior substances suggest that these features are most consistent with being formed due to immiscibility between Fe‐S rich melt and silicate melt during cooling (Hamann et al., 2018; McKay et al., 1970; Pan et al., 2023). The circular rimless depressions are consistent with being margins of solidified troilite, as volume shrinkage during cooling and the different cooling rates between Fe‐S melt and the surrounding silicate melt yielded partially detached margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%