2019
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201900134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetite Nanorods Stabilized by Polyaniline/Reduced Graphene Oxide as a Sensing Platform for Selective and Sensitive Non‐enzymatic Hydrogen Peroxide Detection

Abstract: In this study, magnetite nanorods stabilized on polyaniline/reduced graphene oxide (Fe3O4@PANI/rGO) was synthesized via a wet‐reflux strategy. The possible formation of Fe3O4@PANI/rGO was morphologically and structurally verified by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE‐SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Furthermore, the thermal stability of Fe3O4@PANI/rGO was measured by a thermogravimetric an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 also compares the response of non‐enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors based on other hybrid materials. Among them, our sensor presents a very competitive performance with lower detection limit than most of them [36–38, 42–44, 48, 56–58], comparable to [39, 40, 45, 46, 50–52] and higher than [15, 41, 47, 53–55]. In general, the sensors that present better detection limits than our sensor, are built with several constituents that can make the preparation of the sensor more time consuming, like MWCNTs dispersed in avidin and Ru [15], GO, Fe 3 O 4 , PAMAM and Pd [41], Ag@Cu 2 O and N‐rGO [47], Pt nanoparticles and polyazure A [53], three‐dimensional CuO inverse opals coated with NiO nanoflowers [54] or Au and Ag nanoparticles in connection with a potential of −0.700 V [55].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 also compares the response of non‐enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors based on other hybrid materials. Among them, our sensor presents a very competitive performance with lower detection limit than most of them [36–38, 42–44, 48, 56–58], comparable to [39, 40, 45, 46, 50–52] and higher than [15, 41, 47, 53–55]. In general, the sensors that present better detection limits than our sensor, are built with several constituents that can make the preparation of the sensor more time consuming, like MWCNTs dispersed in avidin and Ru [15], GO, Fe 3 O 4 , PAMAM and Pd [41], Ag@Cu 2 O and N‐rGO [47], Pt nanoparticles and polyazure A [53], three‐dimensional CuO inverse opals coated with NiO nanoflowers [54] or Au and Ag nanoparticles in connection with a potential of −0.700 V [55].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, it is very important to develop new electrode materials that can selectively and sensitively determine DA and distinguish it from AA and UA signals. For this purpose, various electrode materials were designed and modified with carbon nanomaterials [17], metal nanoparticles [18–19], different composite structures [20–23], polymers [24–26], and metal oxides [12, 13, 27]. However, flexible and self‐standing graphene paper electrodes (GPE) prepared in composite structure using metal sulfides have not been used for the determination of DA until now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pristine GO membrane shows a strict rejection of ions and molecules with a hydrated radius larger than 4.75 Å [ 17 ]. To this end, the excellence of GO membranes for practical applications primarily relies on the control of interlayer spacings which indeed, has been a subject of interest for many studies [ 1 , 4 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. However, due to the hydrophilic nature of graphene oxide [ 24 ], the laminates swell when hydrated, expanding the interlayer spacing to more than one nanometer [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%