1980
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.21.5065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization of a type-I superconducting slab in the thermodynamic and the metastable phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was directly observed in single crystals of Sn back in 1958 [20], Hg [8] and Pb [8,24]. The tubular pattern was reproduced numerically [19] and metastability of slabs was theoretically analyzed [21]. Ginzburg -Landau equations have stable multiquanta solution for arbitrary tube size [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was directly observed in single crystals of Sn back in 1958 [20], Hg [8] and Pb [8,24]. The tubular pattern was reproduced numerically [19] and metastability of slabs was theoretically analyzed [21]. Ginzburg -Landau equations have stable multiquanta solution for arbitrary tube size [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…25 Geometrical barriers, however, should emerge in any nonellipsoidal shape whatever the aspect ratio might be. [3][4][5]15 The interplay between such barriers and the applied magnetic field would then also be the reason for the ability of lamellae to leave sample A on decreasing H from the normal state. 12 In this context, the absence of irreversibility when the applied field is perpendicular to the revolution axis in samples A to C should be a consequence of the fact that the sample edges that generate the geometrical barriers become irrelevant in this configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was first studied by Landau 1 and since then different authors have tried to deepen the understanding of magnetic-flux dynamics and equilibrium structures following both theoretical and experimental approaches. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Magnetic hysteresis in type-I superconductors has been attributed historically to impurities, defects, dislocations, and edge barriers. 2 In the last years, thanks to the emergence of high-resolution magneto-optical imaging, this field has been deeply revised, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and different ideas have come to light.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(30) Recall that the growth of flux domes when the dome radius b obeys β = b/a ≪ 1 is determined by Eqs. (9) and (10). For larger domes, the dome-generated local field at the outer edge can be obtained with good accuracy from Eqs.…”
Section: Initial Growth Of Small Flux Domesmentioning
confidence: 88%