Large Meteorite Impacts III 2005
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2384-1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization on impact structures—Constraints from numerical modeling and petrophysics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9). Recent integrated analysis of gravity and borehole petrophysical data and modeling has shown laterally varying physical properties at Bosumtwi, which are related to impact cratering processes (Ugalde et al 2005(Ugalde et al , 2007. Our reconstruction results (Fig.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of the Original Crater Reliefmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9). Recent integrated analysis of gravity and borehole petrophysical data and modeling has shown laterally varying physical properties at Bosumtwi, which are related to impact cratering processes (Ugalde et al 2005(Ugalde et al , 2007. Our reconstruction results (Fig.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of the Original Crater Reliefmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…9) compacted relatively more, as it was underlain by a more porous impact breccia unit, whereas the central uplift/high and the eastern depression subsided relatively less, as they were underlain by less porous, melt-rich breccia related to structural uplift (Fig. 9) (Ugalde et al 2005(Ugalde et al , 2007.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of the Original Crater Reliefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous estimations of the maximum shock pressure distribution within the Bosumtwi impact structure from numerical modeling can be used to predict the extent of fracturing and brecciation caused by the impact, related to the area where P > 1 GPa (Artemieva et al 2004;Ugalde et al 2005). Those results predicted fracturing across the entire crater, within a volume of ~5200 m radius (Artemieva et al 2004; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the present experimental conditions, the observed AMS changes were induced under estimated pressures of as low as 0.5 GPa. The results of numerical modeling predict that this pressure range covers relatively large volumes of target rocks beneath impact craters (e.g., Ugalde et al, 2005). Therefore, the application of AMS to known terrestrial impact structures would provide new insight into the process of impact-related cratering, while its application to suspected terrestrial impact structures would provide evidence of an impact origin.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%