2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10904-015-0217-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magneto Optical Properties of FeBxFe2−xO4 Nanoparticles

Abstract: In this study, FeB x Fe 2-x O 4 nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by the polyol method. The M-H hysteresis curves exhibit superparamagnetic characteristics that are both coercivity and remanent magnetization values are negligible. The particle size dependent Langevin function was applied to calculate the magnetic particle dimensions around 9 nm. The measured magnetic moments of NPs are in range of (1.52-2.2) l B and almost half or less with respect to 4 l B of bulk Fe ferrite. Magnetic anisotropy was specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetism of Fe–B NPs was quantitatively assessed by vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) at room temperature, resulting in a superparamagnetic hysteresis loop (Figure 3B) consistent with a magnetic moment of 8241.8 ± 4.4 μ B per NP and a saturation magnetization of 70 emu per g‐Fe. The saturation magnetization is in agreement with that expected for Fe–B NPs, [ 69–71 ] where the magnetic ordering of Fe is weakened by spin canting states at grain interfaces and iron oxidation at particles surface, [ 72 ] as well as by dilution with a nonmagnetic element like B. [ 71,73 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnetism of Fe–B NPs was quantitatively assessed by vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) at room temperature, resulting in a superparamagnetic hysteresis loop (Figure 3B) consistent with a magnetic moment of 8241.8 ± 4.4 μ B per NP and a saturation magnetization of 70 emu per g‐Fe. The saturation magnetization is in agreement with that expected for Fe–B NPs, [ 69–71 ] where the magnetic ordering of Fe is weakened by spin canting states at grain interfaces and iron oxidation at particles surface, [ 72 ] as well as by dilution with a nonmagnetic element like B. [ 71,73 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The saturation magnetization is in agreement with that expected for Fe–B NPs, [ 69–71 ] where the magnetic ordering of Fe is weakened by spin canting states at grain interfaces and iron oxidation at particles surface, [ 72 ] as well as by dilution with a nonmagnetic element like B. [ 71,73 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Remnant magnetization and coercive field values of s-H curve have negligible magnitudes. The observed characteristic features of the spectra prove the superparamagnetic nature of NPs [32][33][34]. Fig.…”
Section: Vsm Analysismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…From the VSM measurements, saturation magnetization (M s ), remanent magnetization (M r ), and coercivity (H c ) values are evaluated and reported in Table 3. LaMg x Fe 1−x O 3−δ nanocrystalline shows a considerable saturation magnetization (M s ) at room temperature and the M s values decreased with the increase Mg content [14][15][16][17]. It may be because the magnetic nature of Fe 3+ (5 μB) ions was replaced by the nonmagnetic nature of [43].…”
Section: Vsm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substitution of nonmagnetic Mg 2+ ion in LaFeO 3−δ changes their physicochemical and magnetic properties. The magnetic properties of ferrites are affected by composition as well as the type of substitution, cation distribution, and method of preparation [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%