1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.17.1090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoabsorption in Single-Crystal Semiconducting Ferromagnetic Spinels

Abstract: ferring to terminate on the grid wires rather than pass close by them. Hence, it seems that those rings which disappear from the beam are destroyed by interacting strongly with a line, and the charge given up by the ring has good probability of being trapped by the line.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 In CdCr 2 S 4 at room temperature the band gap has been estimated as 1.57 eV exhibiting an unusual blue shift on decreasing temperatures. 36 These band gaps could not explain the observed temperature dependence of ǫ ∞ of the two compounds under consideration which are very similar and suggest a red shift of the band edges from room temperature down to 100 K and a subsequent blue shift in the ferromagnetic phase (CdCr 2 S 4 ) or in the state dominated by ferromagnetic fluctuations (HgCr 2 S 4 ). And indeed, it has been suggested, that these reports on the band gaps in the chromium spinels are heavily influenced by the Cr 3+ crystal field excitations and do not represent the true electronic band edges.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…35 In CdCr 2 S 4 at room temperature the band gap has been estimated as 1.57 eV exhibiting an unusual blue shift on decreasing temperatures. 36 These band gaps could not explain the observed temperature dependence of ǫ ∞ of the two compounds under consideration which are very similar and suggest a red shift of the band edges from room temperature down to 100 K and a subsequent blue shift in the ferromagnetic phase (CdCr 2 S 4 ) or in the state dominated by ferromagnetic fluctuations (HgCr 2 S 4 ). And indeed, it has been suggested, that these reports on the band gaps in the chromium spinels are heavily influenced by the Cr 3+ crystal field excitations and do not represent the true electronic band edges.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The straightforward effect of compression is the reduction of the Cr-Cr distances, which in turn causes the enhancement of the AFM J 1 interactions over the FM J 2 ones. Besides from tuning the magnetic interactions, pressure can also lead to structural [18][19][20][21][22][23] , electronic 21,24,25 , and even magnetic 21 27 . A red-shift of E g was detected below T C 27 , but without any apparent complementary structural effect 5,28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferromagnetism in CdCr 2 S 4 is well known 10 , but early experimental observations of a number of mysterious features have fallen into oblivion: For example, reports of an anomalous expansion coefficient at low temperatures 11,12 , an unexpected concomitant broadening of the d iffraction lines 11 , a strong blue shift of the absorption edge on passing the ferromagnetic phase transition 13 , the observation of anomalously large phonon shifts and damping effects close to T c 14 and the observation of large magneto-resistance effects 15 . Figure 1a shows the inverse magnetic susceptibility χ -1 and the low-temperature magnetization M. The straight line indicates a fit to the paramagnetic susceptibility, which results in a Curie-Weiss temperature of 155 K and a paramagnetic moment of 3.88 µ B , close to the theoretically expected value of 3.87 µ B per Cr…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%