2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetocaloric effect at cryogenic temperature in gadolinium oxide nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is more than double that of hexagonal Gd (and its heteroelement solutions), in the middle of the range attained for Laves phases, intermetallics and alloys, [1] comparable to that of Gd 2 O 3 nanotubes. [23] On the other hand, this value is low with respect to that of other magnetocaloric MNMs, [10,24] a natural consequence of the relatively large L ligands and NTf 2 À counteranions. Beyond this proof-of-principle example, this value can be optimized by properly tailoring the ligands and counterions, so that the same magnetocaloric potential is achieved at a smaller mass/volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This value is more than double that of hexagonal Gd (and its heteroelement solutions), in the middle of the range attained for Laves phases, intermetallics and alloys, [1] comparable to that of Gd 2 O 3 nanotubes. [23] On the other hand, this value is low with respect to that of other magnetocaloric MNMs, [10,24] a natural consequence of the relatively large L ligands and NTf 2 À counteranions. Beyond this proof-of-principle example, this value can be optimized by properly tailoring the ligands and counterions, so that the same magnetocaloric potential is achieved at a smaller mass/volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding magnetocaloric properties, the most perspective of them appear those containing gadolinium atoms Gd 2 ZnMnO 6 26 , Gd 2 FeAlO 6 27 and Sr 2 GdNbO 6 28 with the largest − ΔS M ~ 26 J Kg −1 K −1 determined for the latter compound. From nanoscaled structures, it is worth to mention Eu doped Gd 2 O 3 nanorods 29 that exhibit enhancened MCE when compared with the pure Gd 2 O 3 nanotubes 30 . Here, the promotion of magnetic entropy change up to 20 J Kg −1 K −1 has been ascribed to the surface spin disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spin-1 2 frustrated three-leg-ladder Heisenberg antiferromagnets Cu 3 (OH) 4 AO 4 (A = S or Se), the Cu moments within the two outer legs are ordered, whereas the Cu moments within the inner leg remain random [42,43]. In the spin- 1 2 frustrated quasi-onedimensional antiferromagnet Cu 3 Mo 2 O 9 , the Cu moments within the dimers are ordered, whereas the Cu moments within the chains remain random [44] b: Ho 2 O 3 [30], c: Er 6 WO 12 [31], d: Ho 6 WO 12 [31], e: Dy 6 WO 12 [31], f: Gd 2 O 3 [32], g: Sr 2 DyNbO 6 [33], h: Tm 6 MoO 12 [31], i: Sr 2 YRuO 6 [33], j: Sr 2 DyRuO 6 [33], k: Sr 2 TbRuO 6 [33], l: Er 2 Mn 2 O 7 [34], A: TbMnO 3 (H//a) [35], B: GdTiO 3 (H//c) [36], C: YbTiO 3 (H//c) [37], D: ErTiO 3 (H//c) [37], E: HoTiO 3 (H//c) [38], F: DyTiO 3 (H//c) [39], G: TmTiO 3 (H//c) [40]. Lowercase and uppercase letters indicate the data for powders and single crystals, respectively.…”
Section: B Origin Of the Partially Disordered Statementioning
confidence: 99%