2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetocaloric effect in Fe–Tm–B–Nb metallic glasses near room temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in [49], the possibility of tuning TC whilst keeping the MC properties of a material fairly constant have been one of the most under-studied properties when improving MC-materials performance. Although our ΔSm peak values are an order of magnitude lower than those reported for FeCoNiCuMn [20], (Fe0.76+xTm0.0-xB0.24)96Nb4 [51] and, Mn27Cr7Ni33Ge25Si8 [52], the comparison to the work here should be made with caution. For instance, (Fe0.76+xTm0.0-xB0.24)96Nb4 is of the metallic glass type, Mn27Cr7Ni33Ge25Si8 future a Pnma space structure [52] and magnetic properties as of the FOPT MnCoGe and MnNiGe type of materials [7] [53] and, the ΔSm(T) shape of FeCoNiCuMn-system in [20] reseambles what we obtain at HTT.…”
Section: Analysis: Nps -Cluster Like Behaviour T < Lttcontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…As discussed in [49], the possibility of tuning TC whilst keeping the MC properties of a material fairly constant have been one of the most under-studied properties when improving MC-materials performance. Although our ΔSm peak values are an order of magnitude lower than those reported for FeCoNiCuMn [20], (Fe0.76+xTm0.0-xB0.24)96Nb4 [51] and, Mn27Cr7Ni33Ge25Si8 [52], the comparison to the work here should be made with caution. For instance, (Fe0.76+xTm0.0-xB0.24)96Nb4 is of the metallic glass type, Mn27Cr7Ni33Ge25Si8 future a Pnma space structure [52] and magnetic properties as of the FOPT MnCoGe and MnNiGe type of materials [7] [53] and, the ΔSm(T) shape of FeCoNiCuMn-system in [20] reseambles what we obtain at HTT.…”
Section: Analysis: Nps -Cluster Like Behaviour T < Lttcontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…different magnetic fields for literature comparison. Compared with SOMT conventional magnetocaloric amorphous alloys based on a single principal element [59][60][61][62][63][64], at least 2-fold improvement in S M max and RCP is found for our work. More than 10% larger S M max (up to 8-fold) is observed when comparing our annealed HE-MG microwires to the conventional alloys exhibiting coexistence of amorphous and nanocrystalline phases [1, 34,[65][66][67][68][69][70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In recent years, some crystalline compounds, such as La-Fe-Si [7], Mn-Fe-P-As [8], Gd-Si-Ge [9], and R 1-x M x MnO 3 (where R = La, Nd, Pr and M = Ca, Sr, Ba, etc) [10], presenting giant |∆S M | produced by first-order magnetic phase transitions (FOMTs) have been reported. However, those crystalline materials possess a narrow working temperature span, accompanied by large hysteresis losses, low mechanical instability, and corrosion resistance [10,11], which restrict their practical application as MCE refrigerants. Different from FOMT magnetocaloric materials, crystalline Gd [12], or Gdbased [13] and Fe-based amorphous alloys [14][15][16], undergo second-order magnetic phase transitions with a wider temperature range, generating competitive |∆S M | or RC values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%