2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetohydrodynamics on an unstructured moving grid

Abstract: Magnetic fields play an important role in astrophysics on a wide variety of scales, ranging from the Sun and compact objects to galaxies and galaxy clusters. Here we discuss a novel implementation of ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) in the moving mesh code AREPO which combines many of the advantages of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods in a single computational technique. The employed grid is defined as the Voronoi tessellation of a set of mesh-generating points which can move along with the flow, yielding an au… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
217
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
217
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However there is still significant noise. This comes from a combination of the "partition noise" above (a much milder form, compared to SPH, still exists in these methods, because our discrete volume partition estimator is only accurate to second-order; see § 2.7), as well as the usual "grid noise" associated with mesh motion/deformation (which can be significant here because, as discussed in § 2.6, the implicit deformation of the "effective faces" can be more complicated than simple uniform motion of a flat geometric face; see Springel 2011;McNally et al 2012;Muñoz et al 2014 for discussion of this noise in moving-mesh codes). We also find (not surprisingly) that the degree of vortex decay is very sensitive to our choice of slope-limiter: using a more conservative limit on monotonicity (see § B) leads to a smoother solution but much stronger damping of the vortex peak.…”
Section: Mfv-e Mfv-e (High Mach) Mfv-e (Low Mach)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However there is still significant noise. This comes from a combination of the "partition noise" above (a much milder form, compared to SPH, still exists in these methods, because our discrete volume partition estimator is only accurate to second-order; see § 2.7), as well as the usual "grid noise" associated with mesh motion/deformation (which can be significant here because, as discussed in § 2.6, the implicit deformation of the "effective faces" can be more complicated than simple uniform motion of a flat geometric face; see Springel 2011;McNally et al 2012;Muñoz et al 2014 for discussion of this noise in moving-mesh codes). We also find (not surprisingly) that the degree of vortex decay is very sensitive to our choice of slope-limiter: using a more conservative limit on monotonicity (see § B) leads to a smoother solution but much stronger damping of the vortex peak.…”
Section: Mfv-e Mfv-e (High Mach) Mfv-e (Low Mach)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooling and star formation are modeled as described in Springel & Hernquist (2003). Magnetic fields are modeled with ideal MHD using cell-centered magnetic fields and the Powell scheme (Powell et al 1999) for divergence control (Pakmor et al 2011;Pakmor & Springel 2013).…”
Section: Methods and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a Voronoi tessellation changes continuously for smooth spatial trajectories of the generating points, each cell can be regarded as a "quasi-Lagrangian fluid parcel" (e.g., see Vogelsberger et al 2012). Besides ideal hydrodynamics coupled to self-gravity, the code currently includes routines for magneto-hydrodynamics (Pakmor, Bauer & Springel 2011;Pakmor & Springel 2013; see also Sales et al 2014), as well as numerous sub-resolution prescriptions for galaxy formation physics (Vogelsberger et al 2013). As in any unsplit, second-order, finite-volume method (see e.g., Toro 2009), the hyperbolic Euler equations are discretized for the i-th cell as (Springel 2010a):…”
Section: The Arepo Codementioning
confidence: 99%