1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf02422479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetostriktion in Supraleitern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (for a detailed description of this effect, see Ref. 12). In our case we now have the difficulty that as soon as the external field penetrates into the superconductor and a mixed state is formed, the normal regions undergo a very strong magnetostriction, which, even in these low fields, is at least comparable to the contributions expected from the superconducting properties.…”
Section: Magnetostriction Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (for a detailed description of this effect, see Ref. 12). In our case we now have the difficulty that as soon as the external field penetrates into the superconductor and a mixed state is formed, the normal regions undergo a very strong magnetostriction, which, even in these low fields, is at least comparable to the contributions expected from the superconducting properties.…”
Section: Magnetostriction Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, advanced models based on thermodynamic arguments were developed and successfully applied in many cases. Excellent summaries of that work can be found elsewhere [2][3][4]. In the present overview the focus is set on effects that are caused by the pinning-induced body force, which by its nature can generate very large and irreversible deformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trapped surface field, B 0 , of a fully magnetized HTS and a conventional permanent magnet (PM). The graphs illustrate equations (1) and(2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to magnetostriction of a granular superconductor, its electroelastic behavior is predicted to be dominated by the former contribution for all applied fields.Some attention was given recently to rather peculiar electric-field induced phenomena, either observed experimentally (like a substantial critical current enhancement [1-3]) or predicted to occur (like a possibility of magnetoelectric effect due to the Dzyaloshinski-Moria type coupling between an applied electric field and an effective magnetic field of circulating Josephson currents [4]) in granular superconductors and attributed to their weak-link structure. At the same time, as compared to the magnetoelastic behavior of superconducting materials (dominated either by a vortex response [5][6][7][8] or by weak-links structure [9]), their electroelastic behavior still remains to be properly addressed.In the present communication, another interesting pnenomenon related to the modification of the sample's weak-links structure in an applied electric field is discussed. Namely, we consider a possible role of Josephson junctions in low-temperature behavior of the fieldinduced polarization and the related electroelastic properties of granular superconductors.As is well-known [10], the change of the free energy of a superconductor in the presence of an external electric field E readswhere P (E) is the electric polarization of a granular superconductor at zero temperature (see below), V its volume, and the internal field E i is related to the applied field E via an effective dielectric constant ǫ, namely [10] E i = E/ǫ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attention was given recently to rather peculiar electric-field induced phenomena, either observed experimentally (like a substantial critical current enhancement [1][2][3]) or predicted to occur (like a possibility of magnetoelectric effect due to the Dzyaloshinski-Moria type coupling between an applied electric field and an effective magnetic field of circulating Josephson currents [4]) in granular superconductors and attributed to their weak-link structure. At the same time, as compared to the magnetoelastic behavior of superconducting materials (dominated either by a vortex response [5][6][7][8] or by weak-links structure [9]), their electroelastic behavior still remains to be properly addressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%