2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude and duration of cue-induced craving for Marijuana in volunteers with cannabis use disorder

Abstract: Aims-Evaluate magnitude and duration of subjective and physiologic responses to neutral and marijuana (MJ)-related cues in cannabis dependent volunteers.Methods-33 volunteers (17 male) who met DSM-IV criteria for Cannabis Abuse or Dependence were exposed to neutral (first) then MJ-related visual, auditory, olfactory and tactile cues. Mood, drug craving and physiology were assessed at baseline, post-neutral, post-MJ and 15-min post MJ cue exposure to determine magnitude of cue-responses. For a subset of partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, due to the small subsample of marijuana users with CD, the current research was not sufficiently powered to detect significant group differences, so results may not generalize to studies with higher CD rates. Additionally, the order of cue presentation (neutral cues first) was not counterbalanced to prevent carryover effects (Lundahl and Greenwald, 2015b; Monti et al, 1987; Rohsenow et al, 2001, 2000). However, order effects would only be a threat to the integrity of the design if neutral cues were presented after drug cues (Monti et al, 1987; Sayette and Hufford, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, due to the small subsample of marijuana users with CD, the current research was not sufficiently powered to detect significant group differences, so results may not generalize to studies with higher CD rates. Additionally, the order of cue presentation (neutral cues first) was not counterbalanced to prevent carryover effects (Lundahl and Greenwald, 2015b; Monti et al, 1987; Rohsenow et al, 2001, 2000). However, order effects would only be a threat to the integrity of the design if neutral cues were presented after drug cues (Monti et al, 1987; Sayette and Hufford, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marijuana stimuli (a marijuana cigarette rolled at both ends provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, a lighter, and a used ashtray) were beneath the second cover. Neutral cues were always presented first to prevent carryover effects from the marijuana cues (Lundahl and Greenwald, 2015b; Monti et al, 1987). Participants were first asked to relax for 4 mins and then were instructed to uncover the neutral cues, view them for 2 mins, then touch the pencil to the eraser, smell it, and continue viewing the cues for 2 mins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%