Magnitude of domestic violence and its socio-demographic correlates among pregnant women in Delhi

Garg, Suneela; Singh, M. M.; Rustagi, Ruchir; Engtipi, Kajok; Bala, Indu

doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_597_19

Cited by 18 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only six studies investigated bidirectionality of IPV. In the studies focused on bidirectional IPV, two of these studies were during pregnancy ( 37 , 89 ), one study was during the postpartum period ( 46 ), and three studies were during both pregnancy and the postpartum period ( 42 , 58 , 66 ) ( Table 2 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At follow-up (i.e., during postpartum), a range between 12.3 and 54.1% of women endorsed at least one instance of IPV victimization and 7.4–64.8% endorsed at least one instance of IPV perpetration. After childbirth, two studies suggest that prevalence of IPV perpetration declined for about 10% ( 58 , 66 ), whereas Charles & Perreira ( 41 ) reported around 20% increase in prevalence ( 42 ). In regard to IPV victimization, only Hellmuth et al ( 66 ) reported around 10% increase in prevalence estimates, while others suggest a decrease in prevalence rates for <20% ( 42 , 58 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After childbirth, two studies suggest that prevalence of IPV perpetration declined for about 10% ( 58 , 66 ), whereas Charles & Perreira ( 41 ) reported around 20% increase in prevalence ( 42 ). In regard to IPV victimization, only Hellmuth et al ( 66 ) reported around 10% increase in prevalence estimates, while others suggest a decrease in prevalence rates for <20% ( 42 , 58 ). In addition, it was noted that although there is a percentage of women endorsed perpetrating some form of violence against their intimate partners during the perinatal period, it was not clear if this violence was reciprocal or not.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Among Intimate Partners During the Perinatal Period: A Narrative Literature Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects individuals and families from all backgrounds, regardless of their ethnicity, socio-economic status, sexual orientation, or religion. Pregnancy and childbirth could be a time of vulnerability to violence because of changes in physical, emotional, social, and economic demands and needs. Prevalence of IPV against women during the perinatal period is increasingly researched and documented. However, evidence on IPV prevalence among intimate partners as well as on the course of IPV over the perinatal period is scarce. The purpose of this review was to provide a narrative synthesis of the existing literature regarding the prevalence estimates of IPV among intimate partners over the perinatal period. Through this review, we also gained better insight into associated factors, as well as the various forms of IPV. Of the 766 studies assessing prevalence estimates identified, 86 were included, where 80 studies focused on unidirectional IPV (i.e., perpetrated by men against women) and six studies investigated bidirectional IPV (i.e., IPV perpetrated by both partners). Most of the included studies reported lower overall prevalence rates for unidirectional IPV postpartum (range: 2–58%) compared to pregnancy (range: 1.5–66.9%). Psychological violence was found to be the most prevalent form of violence during the entire perinatal period. Studies on bidirectional IPV mostly reported women's perpetration to be almost as high as that of their partner or even higher, yet their findings need to be interpreted with caution. In addition, our results also highlighted the associated factors of IPV among partners, in which they were assimilated into a multi-level ecological model and were analyzed through an intersectional framework. Based on our findings, IPV is found to be highly prevalent during the entire perinatal period and in populations suffering from social inequalities. Further research exploring not only the occurrence, but also the motivations and the context of the bidirectionality of IPV during the perinatal period may facilitate better understanding of the detrimental consequences on partners and their families, as well as the development of effective intervention strategies. Public health prevention approaches intervening at optimal times during the perinatal period are also needed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Among Intimate Partners During the Perinatal Period: A Narrative Literature Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ 13 ] where the prevalence of Verbal violence was found to be 86.1% followed by physical violence in 63.4% and Garg et al . [ 14 ] who also found that verbal violence followed by economical violence was mainly present. In a study done by Jeyaseelan et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Silent sufferers

Rawat¹,

Bhate²,

Yadav³

2021

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Domestic violence against women is one of the most pervasive abuses of human rights in the world. Violence during pregnancy leads to both acute injuries and profound long-term challenges to health and wellbeing. Pregnancy provides a good opportunity for healthcare personal to screen women for domestic violence. Aim: To identify the pattern of domestic violence amongst pregnant women and to plan appropriate interventions. Settings and Design: This cross-sectional study was carried out at Primary Health Care Centre. Methods and Material: 90 pregnant women attending the ANC OPD and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were compiled and analyzed using SPSS version 24. Percentages were calculated and Chi-square test was used wherever applicable. Results: Violence was mostly seen in the women who were married for five years (47.36%) and many among them experienced it within one year of marriage (34.28%). The most common violence faced by the women was verbal violence (44.73%), followed by financial violence (27.63%). Physical violence was experienced by 22.36% women. The Perceived risk factor for violence was mostly addiction of spouse in 26.31% of women and insufficient dowry and demand for male child in 19.73%. Conclusions: As occurrence of violence was found to be significantly associated with duration of marriage, educational status, and earning status of women asking about intimate partner violence should be a part of routine antenatal care for early detection and identification of cases, their counseling, and appropriate interventions.

show abstract

“…Caste, religion, literacy status of study subjects, and occupational status of spouses of study subjects were reported as significant correlates affecting the causation of domestic violence among the subjects. [ 20 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Domestic violence against women: A hidden and deeply rooted health issue in India

Bhattacharya

Yasmin

Bhattacharya³

et al. 2020

J Family Med Prim Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Magnitude of domestic violence and its socio-demographic correlates among pregnant women in Delhi

Cited by 18 publications

References 10 publications

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Among Intimate Partners During the Perinatal Period: A Narrative Literature Review

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Among Intimate Partners During the Perinatal Period: A Narrative Literature Review

“Silent sufferers

Domestic violence against women: A hidden and deeply rooted health issue in India

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About