2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.224406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnon dispersion and thermodynamics inCsNiF3

Abstract: We present an accurate transfer matrix renormalization group calculation of the thermodynamics in a quantum spin-1 planar ferromagnetic chain. We also calculate the field dependence of the magnon gap and confirm the accuracy of the magnon dispersion derived earlier through a 1/n expansion. We are thus able to examine the validity of a number of previous calculations and further analyze a wide range of experiments on CsNiF 3 concerning the magnon dispersion, magnetization, susceptibility, and specific heat. Alt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative resulting J indicates the antiferromagnetic, whereas the positive J, the ferromagnetic coupling. The ferromagnetic exchange interaction along the Niatom chain is in excellent agreement with the experimental value of 23.6 K [7,10], but for the antiferromagnetic coupling between Ni-chains the calculated value is about twice the experimental one J = −0.05 K [10]. However, such small exchange interactions are near to the edge of accuracy of total energy calculations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The negative resulting J indicates the antiferromagnetic, whereas the positive J, the ferromagnetic coupling. The ferromagnetic exchange interaction along the Niatom chain is in excellent agreement with the experimental value of 23.6 K [7,10], but for the antiferromagnetic coupling between Ni-chains the calculated value is about twice the experimental one J = −0.05 K [10]. However, such small exchange interactions are near to the edge of accuracy of total energy calculations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The exact estimation of T N within the Heisenberg model would be possible using the time and resources more demanding Monte Carlo approach and it would most likely increase the RPA estimate. The remaining disagreement with respect to the experiment can be probably explained by the presence of crystal field effect, that is of the same order of magnitude compared to the strongest exchange interaction J [7]. Crystal field effects typically decrease estimated critical temperatures [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The equations of motion for the spins, i ∂S [7]. Only the nearest-neighbor interactions have been taken into account, 2J RR = J(δ R ,R+1 + δ R ,R−1 ).…”
Section: Failure Of the Sg Model For Csnifmentioning
confidence: 99%