SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 1996
DOI: 10.2118/36612-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnus Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatments - A Case History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Where the completed interval is longer, it is often necessary to enter the well and use coiled tubing to spot the inhibitor or use another method of fluid diversion. 11,12 The design of such treatments has focused on the use of placement software which allows treatment volumes to be evaluated and economic evaluation of the treatment life versus cost to be carried out. 13,14,15 The frequency of the inhibitor squeezes will depend on the Minimum Inhibitor Concentration (MIC) needed to inhibit scale formation.…”
Section: Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Where the completed interval is longer, it is often necessary to enter the well and use coiled tubing to spot the inhibitor or use another method of fluid diversion. 11,12 The design of such treatments has focused on the use of placement software which allows treatment volumes to be evaluated and economic evaluation of the treatment life versus cost to be carried out. 13,14,15 The frequency of the inhibitor squeezes will depend on the Minimum Inhibitor Concentration (MIC) needed to inhibit scale formation.…”
Section: Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reveres the injection sequence AFD/base oil followed by the emulsion solution (simulated backflow in the well) 11. Flood core with crude oil to Swi at reservoir temperature 12 17. The core will be examined by environmental scanning electron microscopy prior to/after chemical treatment and permeability data assessed Brine and oil permeability measured while carrying out both types of floods are presented in Tables 6 and 7.…”
Section: Well Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes for reduction can come from wetting alteration/water blocking at water sensitive reservoirs (Jordan et al 1998;Graham et al 1999;Poynton et al 2000;Guan et al 2003) and/or poor well cleanup for wells with poor lifting (Ravenscroft et al 1996;Collins 1997;Graham et al 2002;Wat et al 2001;Guan and Rohde 2009). The application of nonaqueous scale inhibitors has been proposed to address some of these concerns, many types have been reported ranging from invert emulsion-type technologies (Lawless and Smith 1999;Collins et al 2000;Smith et al 2000), microemulsions (Miles et al 2003), encapsulated products Collins 1997) amphiphilic solvent systems, (Collins et al 1998;Guan et al 2006;) and oil-miscible materials (Wat et al 1999;Wat et al 1998a;Wat et al 1998b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present there is little literature relating to the use of viscosified solutions for scale inhibitor treatments, other than for temporary diversion. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Although viscous treatments are not usually associated with scale inhibitor treatments, the viscosity of the main chemical injection pill (typically 10 -20 % scale inhibitor dissolved in sea water) will normally be higher than that of the overflush (seawater). Moreover, in other less conventional treatments involving higher viscosity main treatments, including for example emulsified chemical treatments, the overflush used is generally a much lower viscosity fluid (diesel).…”
Section: Squeeze Placement In Horizontal Wells -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%