2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10761-009-0088-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magunkaquog Materiality, Federal Recognition, and the Search for a Deeper History

Abstract: This article explores the manner in which archaeology can address some of the issues that confront contemporary Native American groups trying to gain federal recognition. Often frustrating and at times capricious, the federal recognition process privileges documentary evidence over other forms of information in determining the political and cultural continuity demanded of groups seeking recognition. Demonstrating cultural continuity is hindered by the antiquated, assimilationist views that underpin the recogni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of spatial arrangements of these towns might have been relatively uniform. Daniel Gookin's description of another Praying Town established in Magunkaquog (within the boundaries of Natick and operating under its supervision) and the recent excavations on the site provide a very similar picture to that of early Natick (Herbster 2005;Mrozowski et al 2005Mrozowski et al , 2009). These settlements were a clear example of how frontiers and neighborhoods create opportunity for social and economic leverage, how they promote the creation of new roles and identities and how these diverse projects and negotiations make use of material objects.…”
Section: Praying Indian Towns -Colonial Frontier Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of spatial arrangements of these towns might have been relatively uniform. Daniel Gookin's description of another Praying Town established in Magunkaquog (within the boundaries of Natick and operating under its supervision) and the recent excavations on the site provide a very similar picture to that of early Natick (Herbster 2005;Mrozowski et al 2005Mrozowski et al , 2009). These settlements were a clear example of how frontiers and neighborhoods create opportunity for social and economic leverage, how they promote the creation of new roles and identities and how these diverse projects and negotiations make use of material objects.…”
Section: Praying Indian Towns -Colonial Frontier Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates the impression that native peoples either disappeared or assimilated with the rise of the modern, pluralistic US nation. With the recent push to examine the full spectrum of colonialism, which includes nineteenth- and twentieth-century historical and contemporary contexts, a growing number of studies put indigenous people back on the central stage with settler colonists (e.g., Cipolla 2013; Mrozowski et al 2009; Silliman 2009, 2012).…”
Section: Beyond the Study Of First Contact Encountersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to the archaeology of colonialism, an examination of autonomy de-centers static, trait-based approaches to native cultures and the concomitant scholarly focus on externally-imposed change. By countering the myth of the vanishing Indian, such studies also offer opportunities for collaboration between archaeologists and indigenous communities (Cipolla, 2013;Mrozowski et al, 2009).…”
Section: Colonialism Landscapes and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%