2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Main dietary compounds and pancreatic cancer risk. The quantitative analysis of case–control and cohort studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
51
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
51
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous cohort studies have found significant findings in men but not in women . Two meta‐analyses on 10 and 11 prospective studies found no significant relation between red meat intake and pancreatic cancer. However, both meta‐analyses reported a significant p ‐heterogeneity among the cohort studies due to differing red meat definitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous cohort studies have found significant findings in men but not in women . Two meta‐analyses on 10 and 11 prospective studies found no significant relation between red meat intake and pancreatic cancer. However, both meta‐analyses reported a significant p ‐heterogeneity among the cohort studies due to differing red meat definitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Dose‐response meta‐analyses of eight prospective cohort studies revealed that higher intake of red meat was positively, but insignificantly, associated with pancreatic cancer risk with some heterogeneity between studies . In addition, two meta‐analyses on five case–control studies and 11 prospective cohort studies similarly found significant positive associations for red meat which were stronger in case–control studies and among men, respectively . Processed meat was also positively associated with pancreatic cancer; however, the association was only significant in men .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Published studies have examined the effect of risk factors for the development of pcc and factors that affect survival (including smoking, caffeine use, alcohol consumption, comorbidity, occupational exposure, and diet 17,19,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] ), although some of the risks are not clear 39,40 . Unfortunately, information on the foregoing risk factors are not available in provincial administrative databases; however, a review of this cohort's pathology reports to look at the effect of stage on survival is underway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently published results of meta-analysis of prospective studies indicated that red meat consumption was positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk in men but not in women [37]. On the other hand, according to the other meta-analysis, red meat was associated with higher pancreatic cancer risk in case-control studies but not in cohort studies [38]. Results from the large population-based prospective cohort of women in Sweden support a possible positive association of long-term red meat consumption and an inverse association of long-term poultry consumption with pancreatic cancer risk [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some surveys confirm a positive influence of fruit as regards protection against pancreatic cancer [38, 42], and others do not observe such a link [43]. In Poland, the growth in fruit consumption may have contributed to the reduced incidence in recent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%