Rock Engineering and Rock Mechanics: Structures in and on Rock Masses 2014
DOI: 10.1201/b16955-96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Main difficulties and lessons learnt during the TBM excavation in shales in the North portal of Pajares tunnels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geology of the Pajares variant tunnels was well-described by Alonso and Rubio [41], who analyzed the area marked in Figure 2. This particular stretch of the tunnel, called the San Emiliano formation, presented singular stability problems [42,43]. The Bolaños tunnel has a 10 m diameter and is a twin tunnel, though we analyzed only one of them in this study.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geology of the Pajares variant tunnels was well-described by Alonso and Rubio [41], who analyzed the area marked in Figure 2. This particular stretch of the tunnel, called the San Emiliano formation, presented singular stability problems [42,43]. The Bolaños tunnel has a 10 m diameter and is a twin tunnel, though we analyzed only one of them in this study.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risks of entrapment and gas emissions were other potential setbacks that did not occur, despite that they were prone to occur in the actual geological conditions found, and therefore, they must be counted in the assessment of the project [42,43]. The potential entrapment, with an average of 30 days, would have a total fixed cost of EUR 900,000.…”
Section: Pajares Variant Lot 3 Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection to the existing segments were carried out with steel connectors (Figure 5b), -Demolition of the central segments and completion of the steel collar (see (Figure 5b), -Excavation of the cross passage with conventional tunnelling according to NATM, From a geological point of view the San Emiliano formation is a complex carboniferous formation, mainly constituted by shales and black slates but also composed of sandstone, limestone and some thin non-exploitable coal seams folded with an estimated value of RMR from 20 to 70 [5]. During the construction sequence, the values of encountered RMR were, in fact, between 35 and 55 [6], which lead to an in-depth revision of the geotechnical parameters [4] employed for TBM lining and cross passages as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Fig 2 3d Simulation Of Tbm Cross Passages With Structural mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general overestimation of the ground parameters in the Pajares Tunnel [4] during tender design produced local entrapment of the TBM [6] and the Client decided to increase TBM lining from the 0.5 m proposed in the tender design to 0.6 m. This increment of the lining depth also affected the cross passages, which needed a structural redesign during the first excavation process [7]. Table 2 collects the first lining changes carried out during the construction stage; moreover, to avoid squeezing effects on cross passage tunnels, the secondary lining…”
Section: Fig 2 3d Simulation Of Tbm Cross Passages With Structural mentioning
confidence: 99%